http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/23/investing/barclays-gold-rigging/index.html?hpt=hp_t3 The guy who tried to rig gold prices and cost his bank $44 million It was all over in 10 minutes, but it cost Barclays nearly $44 million and landed another blow to the giant bank's reputation. Nearly two years ago, a Barclays trader took advantage of weak internal controls in a bid to rig the price of gold and profit at a customer's expense. On Friday, Barclays (BCS) was fined £26 million, or nearly $44 million, by British regulators. Public documents lay out how the trader was able to slip through the bank's oversight. Related: Barclays to shed 19,000 jobs The story begins on June 27, 2012. It was already a lousy day in the history of Barclays. The U.K. banking icon had been exposed for trying to manipulate global interest rates and fined $453 million. Separately, gold trader Daniel Plunkett stood to lose heavily on a single trade. A client of his had staked about $43 million on a two-year bet that the price of gold would rise. Plunkett was on the other side of that bet: If gold prices rose, he would lose money. The contract for the trade was based on the London Gold Fixing -- a benchmark price set by a group of banks, including Barclays, in a process that dates back to 1919. If gold was "fixed" above $1,558.96 an ounce on June 28, the bank would have to pay $3.9 million and Plunkett's trading book would take a hit. On June 27, gold was fixed at $1,573.50. And worse, future prices were trading higher that evening. So Plunkett emailed the metals trading desk at Barclays to tell them he was hoping for a "mini puke" -- or fall -- in the price the following day. "Hopefully we fix 1,558, or 1,558.75 ideal," he repeated to a colleague early on June 28, regulators said. At the time, Barclays' systems were unable to spot such attempts to manipulate benchmark prices. It couldn't properly manage the conflict of interest between being part of the price-setting club and selling products dependent on those prices. It was a weakness Plunkett was able to exploit. The Gold Fixing began as usual at 3 pm. Deutsche Bank (DB), HSBC (HBCYF), Scotiabank and Societe Generale (SCGLF) joined Barclays on a conference call. After a few minutes weighing up buying and selling interest, the group came up with a proposed "fix" of $1,558.50. But the balance swung in favor of buyers, so Plunkett jumped in with a sell order for 60,000 ounces (worth about $90 million) in the hope of preventing a price rise. At 3:10 pm the "fix" was done at $1,558.50, letting Barclays off the hook and boosting Plunkett's trading book by $1.75 million. Plunkett's victory was short-lived. The customer demanded an explanation almost immediately, and after an investigation, Barclays made good on the trade. "We very much regret the situation that led to this settlement," said Barclays CEO Antony Jenkins. The bank has worked hard to improve systems and controls, and was committed to the "highest standards," he added. Plunkett was fined £96,500 and banned from trading.
Good that these guys are getting caught. However a fine is merely a slap on the wrist. Further punishment should be pursued by the British government to that no company will ever rig the interest rates or gold prices ever again.
Nothing from our resident bank defenders? What about the dude that told me I made him sick because of my anti-bank demeanor? You guys have nothing to say? This is just more evidence of one rogue trader? Come on guys, you must have something to say in Barclay's defense....being the upstanding corporate citizens they are...
I too am shocked......With Barclays already having a solid and blemish free reputation in the banking world....not them!
Honestly, I believe we are so embedded that it's not really possible. As much as I'd really like to see this happen, that idea could not just be the law tomorrow. It'd take years to unwind, and I'd like to see a start to that soon. Like Tuesday, when business and the government open back up. As much as I'd like to truly discuss this, it cannot happen on here.
Are you suggessting a return to laisssez faire economics? This can't happen because businesses will do whatever they can to increase profits. Think about the meat packing industry before the FDA. Think about how many American Corporations are moving to china to cut out environmental expenses and labor expenses. Trying to talk about this without Politics is difficult yet possible. I merely cited historical and modern examples.
