For those of you who are members of WINS, you have undoubtedly heard about the Burnside bracelet from Cripple Creek, but if not then visit the WINS website for the complete story. You can visit the WINS website here... http://www.winsociety.org/newsletter/vol-7/A-Tale-of-Love-Tokens.html. This weekend, John Baumgart, a fellow WINS member will have the bracelet up at the Central States Show at his table. He will be at Table 805 and from what I understand, will be displayed prominently in his case. The owner and the consigner are looking to find this bracelet a nice new home and Kagins is supposed to stop by one day to let them know if they will auction it off or buy it outright. Enjoy.
I join the consensus, that is just one cool item! Thanks for posting it, Joe! Though, I read the linked story, unless I overlooked it, it doesn't mention what kind of stone is set in that bracelet (I'm definitely NOT a gemologist). Anyone??
Hey Ken, I am not sure what the stone composed of, nor do I think the owner does either and without some kind of gem test, it would be hard to say.
Thanks, Joe. When the piece is at the show, perhaps an update to this thread could be done. Would love to know what type of stone it is, though I'm guessing it's the beloved's birth stone.
If I remember correctly, some theories were passed around such as a birth stone or a stone representing the month of their marriage. Either way, I will keep you posted.
This really is an awesome piece; I'm going to be both happy and sad to see it find a new home some day.
As far as the stone, based on one jeweler's expertise, it is likely red spinel. The jeweler said it was "too perfect" to be a genuine ruby and might either be red spinel or possibly one of the earlier synthetic rubies created. I was (and still am) a little bit in disbelief that a man with so much wealth and love for his wife would have used anything but a ruby, but perhaps that's just the romantic in me. I do intend, at some point, to get a second opinion on the stone. The stone is not mentioned in the article because it's still up for debate.
Thanks for that response! I agree with your 'romantic' side....one would think it would be a real stone, given his wealth, and how far he went, with the bracelet, itself. I can't imagine someone, today, going to that extent (with that kind of wealth) with the bracelet, and NOT putting in a genuine stone. Nowadays, that might be cause for divorce!! lol
To add to the provenance, I handed the gentleman, who will be displaying it at station #805 in the show today, a book titled Cripple Creek Days, which mentions the Burnsides several times, an actual receipt from W.O. Burnside's store, and some newspaper clippings (reprinted from the internet) mentioning the Burnside Mercantile Company and Mr. Burnside's purchase of the Laconing Claim. It's been a real treat resarching this bracelet.
Thank you for the introduction Joe. I'm probably going to be more of a lurker for posts that interest me, or when I'm searching for coins (which I always am).