Logic of Morgan Dollar values

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ctrl, Oct 26, 2011.

  1. ctrl

    ctrl Member

    Hi,

    This is something I've thought about before, but an article on coinnews.com today brings it up again: Given that most Morgan dollars didn't really circulate and the actual rarity of most is numerically questionable relative to other series, why are Morgan Dollars priced so high?

    The article states:
    Are the prices really just held high because of the general interest and demand? Are they the highest-demand US series, and therefore the number of people competing for the thousands of good extant examples keep the price high, not to mention pervasive marketing from retailers?

    http://www.coinweek.com/news/featur...f-silver-coins-part-1-dimes-and-half-dollars/
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. coleguy

    coleguy Coin Collector

    I'd say it's demand. Look at the 09S VDB cent or the 16D dime...neither rare at all and both saved from day one, yet demand has pushed their value far above what it should be.
    Guy
     
  4. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    Demand is really high, I agree. But also with that demand is the fact that a large number, and no one may know the exact number, of Morgans were hoarded by the U.S. Mint because they were not well received by the public when they were released. Banks were receiving them back in exchange for either paper currency, or gold denominations.

    It's believed, and estimated, that there were hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Morgans held in not only the vaults in the Philadelphia Mint, but also in vaults at the Federal Reserve, when the Mint simply ran out of room to store them.

    Because of this hoard, there were bags full of Morgans that were not circulated as much, if at all, and were found to be in exquisite condition, save waffle toning patterns, and very slight bag marks.

    The Morgan also has the most interesting history of all coinage in the U.S.
     
  5. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    You also have to keep in mind that 350 million were authorized to be melted under the Pittman Act, but I believe the actual number melted was 270-300 million. No records were kept regarding the number per date/mintmark that went to the melting pot.

    Chris
     
  6. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    Really? I would not say they had the most interesting history myself. If you incorporate all of the history regarding the silver market during that timeframe as "morgan dollar history", then maybe. I prefer the history of items like the chain cent, the first half disme, or even the shenanigans of classic commemoratives to Morgan history.

    To each his own I suppose.

    To the OP, yes, the pricing is completely demand driven versus relative rarity of other US coins. Almost any SL half produced in the 1880's has a total mintage of less than the number of 1893s still available, yet are a fraction of the price.

    Chris
     
  7. RaceBannon

    RaceBannon Member

    My answer to that is yes. Morgan dollars are perhaps the most highly collected US coin series after the Lincoln Cent. Now add to that their history, the fact that each one contains almost an ounce of silver, that many of the key dates were melted, and that many dates can be had in high grade because they were never released to the public, and you have the perfect storm of demand, appeal and marketing all coming together to create very expensive coins, especially for the key dates.


    Most collectors want a complete set of any series, aside from the 95 P which was only issued as a proof and is beyond the means of most average collectors, the 93 S Morgan is the king, it's the coin most collectors need, in any condition to complete their set.


    You've got a lot of people willing to pay the premium for the King.
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    In a nutshell, yes, definitely. More than anything it's the public's perception of any given coin that drives its value. Even this thread contributes to that perception.

    Take that article you linked to. If a thousand people read that, the only thing that 500 of them will remember about the '93-S Morgan is how much that article says it is worth. And they probably won't even remember the numbers, they'll just remember that is sounds like a lot to them. This is perception.

    Now multiply that article by a thousand, maybe 5,000 even, for that's how many articles and/or books will mention the '93-S. Then multiply that by 10,000 because that's how many people there will be that are told about the article by somebody who read it. That's how perception gets to be what it is.

    You want to know which coins are worth the most money, that's easy. Just look at which ones get the most press.

    You want to know which coins are actually more rare than the ones getting the press, that takes a bit of work. You actually have to study. And that's exactly why they aren't worth as much.

    Perception is everything, and it is created. And rarely is it genuine or deserved.
     
  9. ctrl

    ctrl Member

    Are there any estimates on how many people collect US coins? It makes sense to me that even if some series, like the Morgans, are relatively common but universally collected the number of collectors greatly exceeds even the higher population numbers of the dollars.
     
  10. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    You will get very fuzzy numbers if you ask how many Americans "collect" coins. The number will be astronomically high, as they will count every person who puts aside a bicentennial quarter, or a wheat cent. A much lower number would be who are serious collectors, (maybe defining as spending XXX per year on coins), a lower number still would be those who collect US coins, and still lower those who collect morgans. Then, from this population you still need to define those who collect by date and mintmark, and then how many can afford the pricetag of a 93s. Then you have your demand population, after taking out those who already have one.

    I am just saying "how many US coin collectors?" can be a very misleading number, even if you find an answer. Any answer will have to be scrutinized on what level they are considering a "collector".

    Chris
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    There is no answer, but there's a lot of guesses. Some of those guesses are even educated. And some are not.

    The US Mint tried to claim that there were over 120 million coin collectors when the State Quarter craze was going on. To me, that is beyond even ridiculous.

    Coin World did an article on the subject some years back and their estimate was around 300,000. I find this to be a much more realistic number.
     
  12. medoraman

    medoraman Well-Known Member

    Very true. Thanks for the numbers. I knew what the mint estimated was high, but its technically untrue. If you consider anyone who keeps a coin for any reason a "collector", then I think 120 million is fair. This would be anyone who ever sees a wheat cent, a bicentennial quarter, or an Ike or SBA dollar and throws them in the junk drawer instead of spending them. To you and I that is not a collector, but could be construed as one.
     
  13. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    there is a god. and you have learnt how to spell

    Rediculous is dead long live ridiculous :D
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

  15. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    now we will never know what you were trying to say
     
  16. iGradeMS70

    iGradeMS70 AKA BustHalfBrian

    You need to buy the black sheep... Never go for the coins that thrive off of demand, unless of course you need to fill that hole in your Dansco.

    -Brian
     
  17. Doug21

    Doug21 Coin Hoarder

    If saved from day #1 then why are there so many AG-3 merc dimes dated 1916-D ?

    I'll agree the 1909-SVDB is easy in high grades
     
  18. Twinturbo

    Twinturbo New Member

    No demand no value look at the 3cent series.
     
  19. Twinturbo

    Twinturbo New Member

    1916-d dimes are found easily now, most werent saved until the early 1940's
    Most are low grade, since they saw10-15 years of circulation
     
  20. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Because they didn't save all of them, so many of them got put into circulation. But there were a lot that were saved, and that's why there are so many MS examples of them today.

    It was the first year for that coin, so a lot of people saved them just for that reason. The '09-S VDB - the same thing happened. It happened with a lot of coins on their first year, and it happened with a lot of coins on their last year. People tend to save, even today, the first year and the last year. They always have.

    But when one of those coins from the first year or last year, also happens to have a relatively low mintage - then the value of that coin inevitably shoots skywards. And when it happens that the first year or the last year have a high mintage - then the value never goes anyplace and it stays low.

    It's all a matter of luck and circumstance. And we never know what the outcome will be until it has already happened. As they say, hindsight is wonderful.
     
  21. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    And with the SVDB it was announced in the newspapers that the coin was being changed to remove the initials just four days after they were introduced so a lot MORE were hoarded than would normally have been saved. This is why the SVDB is not a "rare" coin even though the mintage was very low. The 16-D dime on the other hand received no special notice other than being a first year of issue. At the time collecting by date and mintmark was not common so it didn't matter that much that the Denver dime had a low mintage. If it hadn't been a first year of issue it would be much rarer today than it is.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page