Would you try to conserve this coin?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by statequarterguy, Feb 20, 2010.

  1. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Would you try to conserve this coin? If so, what would you do to it, or not do to it?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    No I would not, but I am sure others might try with acetone. But I would wait for someone that knows more than me.
     
  4. it just looks like ugly toning? i would never clean a coin
     
  5. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    Is it really ugly toning, or is it something else, or are the pictures just so so. I mean the coin looks to be in good condition. A bath in acetone won't hurt it, but if it doesn't need it I wouldn't do it.
     
  6. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

  7. hiho

    hiho off to work we go

    PLEASE don't clean it. I resisted the urge on this crusty Busty and I am glad I did...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  8. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    statequarterguy - To my eyes it looks like somebody already did.

    Same for your coin hiho.

    Now somebody is going to ask me why I think that. Here's why.

    Most of us know that with circulated coins it is common to find them encrusted with a combination of dirt, grime & toning. And most of the time the high points and some of the fields will be rubbed sort of clean. That's normal. But what is not normal is for some of the more protected areas to be cleaner than they should be. If they are cleaner than they should be, as to compared to the rest of the coin - then that is an indication that somebody has cleaned or attempted to clean the coin.

    On SQGuys coin, some of the areas that should be lighter colored are not, like the big open area of the field to the right on the obv. And other areas that should be dark, are not. Like the small, protected area of the field left of Liberty's neck. On the rev, small protected area between the eagel's left wing and body (right side of the coin) is way cleaner than it should be. And the shield, the lower vertical shield lines are rubbed pretty clean. But it is the upper horizontal lines that should be rubbed clean as they are higher - and yet they are not.

    On your coin hiho, the field area between the bottom of the bust and the date - nothing should ever be able to touch that area during normal use bcaus it is surrounded by high points. That should be one of the darkest areas on the coin. But yet it is clean. Same for the area under the eagle's head.

    So just based on these things it appears that at some point somebody has cleaned these coins. I agree completely that further attempts are ill advised.
     
  9. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I don't think anything could be done to help either coin.
    The toning is probably hiding lots of tiny marks.
    A dip would make it look really nasty.
    The price on the Ebay one is already more than I would pay.
     
  10. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    The coins I'm seeing here cannot be conserved.
    They can only be cleaned which of course is a no-no.
     
  11. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Thanks all for your input, which is my gut feeling too - any attempt to improve the coin probably wouldn't. Yet it's tempting to try, given its low value as is and the coin's potential if it improves. Since it appears to have been an improperly stored gem and given the price it sold for, an attempt to improve it probably wouldn't lower its value much more (it's already rock bottom at a G4 price) and if it does improve, the value goes up significantly.

    I'd say it looks like it was an unc and what appears to be wear on Liberty (in the pic, but maybe it’s not) is from the attempt to clean it. If Liberty hasn’t been damaged, the rest of the attempted cleaning doesn’t appear to have damaged the coin significantly. Did they stop the cleaning because there is definitely pitting under the heavy stuff? Although my experience tells me there is probably pitting, I’m not convinced the coins appeal can’t be improved, given the fact an attempt to do so ain’t going to make it worth a lot less. With a minimally invasive cleaning and many years of proper storage (opportunity to tone correctly), I think the coin could exhibit much better eye appeal.

    So, given the facts of this coins condition, if one were to attempt to improve it, not wanting to dip it long enough to remove the heavy stuff, thus dooming the luster and eating away the sharpness, what would you use to attempt to remove the heavy stuff?
     
  12. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    What you are calling heavy stuff looks to be dark toning and a dip is the only thing that will remove it. It's in the surface of the coin not just on it. I don't feel you can ever remove it all and any try at dipping it will end in a worse looking coin. It is what it is but would love to see the images after you finish messing with it.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    LOL! I'll be sure and post the before and after pics, if I decide to take a chance. It may look better in person - it does look better in the smaller images.
     
  14. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    The damage has already been done. The 'toning' had advanced to straight out corrosion and the pitting can already be seen. I have no doubt additional 'toning' will eventually render this a truly ugly filler.

    This is why I can't understand the appeal of toners. It's always just the beginning of the end.
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Can you really see pitting in that image?
     
  16. statequarterguy

    statequarterguy Love Pucks

    Yeah, I think it's premature to say there's pitting - but likely so under the heavier toning.

    I hear what you're saying about toning, left unchecked it will eventually ruin a coin. But, a lightly toned coin, with hints of rainbow, is a beautiful coin, as is a blast white one. Either one of these coin's toning can be virtually stopped, though not completely, by placing it in an as air tight as possible holder.
     
  17. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Acetone has been often mentioned as a means to remove PVC plasticizers/infections, but it also can be used to remove any loosely bound molecular water from the corrosion process. It doesn't remove corrosion products, but it can reduce it's activity due to lessened water. Then putting it into a "relatively air tight" holder will basically stop the corrosion process IMO.

    But this is a coin I believe in corrosion process rather than toning, and although I can not point to any spot and guarantee pitting, I would strongly expect to find it.

    Jim
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Because toning is virtually stopped once storage conditions are changed and optimized. So an attractively toned coin will remain attractive virtually forever. That's why.

    Also, since toning is inevitable on any coin that is improperly stored, and since the vast majority of all storage methods are improper - based on your line of thinking the vast majority of all coins are doomed.
     
  19. Marshall

    Marshall Junior Member

    While I can certainly be wrong, I believe I see significant corrosion including flaking around the stars which is already in the process of further corrosion. The metal is being transformed into other molecules and they are not protecting the underlying metal like a few compounds do which result in conservation of the coin's base metal.
     
  20. tiag12

    tiag12 w/out the penny we'd all

    It looks like it's been through the ringer, but...

    I would:
    • Not sell it, (unless I was able to reap a very nice reward).
    • Leave it alone, and or
    • Not clean it at all
     
  21. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    I take it back, based on the larger photos I would take the chance and dip it. I think it is dog ugly and would either dip it or dispose of it, either way I couldn't keep it looking like that.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page