Would any of these be considered RPM?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Dynoking, Jan 16, 2017.

  1. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    64 RPM 3.jpg 64 RPM 3.jpg 64 RPM 4.jpg 64 RPM 3.jpg 64 RPM 4.jpg 64 RPM 5.jpg 64 RPM 6.jpg 64 RPM 3.jpg 64 RPM 4.jpg 64 RPM 5.jpg 64 RPM 6.jpg 64 RPM 7.jpg 64 RPM 8.jpg 64 RPM 9.jpg 64 RPM 10.jpg 64 RPM 12.jpg All of the following are '64 quarters. Are any considered to have RPM's?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    They look like machine doubling or die deterioration to me.

    Chris
     
  4. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Need more pictures please... :banghead:
     
  5. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

    This is a hard thing to call yes or no, because of the scale on which you need to view. Pulling from my limited experiance I would say that what I'm seeing is machine doubling due to the shelf like appearance of the metal around the Mintmarks.
    Photo# 1,2,4,8, are the same, 3,5,9 same, 6,10 same, 7,11 same, = 8 coins, 15 photos?:arghh:
     
  6. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    Sure about the last one Chris? Looks like it had a triple bounce.
     
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I'm still about 95% sure. Note the top left. It looks like the middle is deterioration and underneath it is machine doubling.

    Chris
     
    tommyc03 likes this.
  8. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Sorry about that. This is my first attempt using the images from touplite. Not what I did during the conversion from bmp to jpeg.
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2017
  9. alurid

    alurid Well-Known Member

  10. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Thanks alurid! Interesting read.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page