I purchased this Lincoln cud error at CoinFest in Stamford Connecticut this weekend. It was sold as a 1989 dated cud & it is listed in the cud book as a 1989 dated cud. With so much of the date covered by the cud do you think that a TPG would label it 1989? BTW, I have two examples of this cud now & I don't plan to have them slabbed. Very best regards, collect89
That;s a major cud nice one I think they fetch a nice premium because it is a good size one I think they will deignate it, just a major cud or cud and they will slab it as a 1989 Yes Jazzcoins Joe:whistle:
collect: How much did it sell for? Sorry, I had to ask. I saw another biggie recently, with a date, and had no idea of value.
I am pretty sure that the 1989-P Lincoln Cent is well known and documented to have this specific Cud! If I am correct, then yes, they would label the coin as a 1989-P. Frank
I can't see it being anything but a 1980 or 1989, if it isn't copper, it's 1989. Also no mint mark, but if there is a history of 1989-p maybe. Or perhaps "1989?" or "1989 no mint mark"? or 1989 CUD. Maybe Email and ask, ANACS adds lots of stuff to the labels that other TPG don't.
Hello Frank, The price of a large cud on a red dated cent might be $20 to $50. Maybe $60 or $70 if it is also MS65+. If the cud covers 25% of the coin maybe $100. Half the coin maybe $500. Here are some of the other cuds from that same year. I believe that the retail on these 1989 dated examples would all fall into the $10 to $50 price range. Very best regards, collect89
As the '89 is known to have this type cud , and by looking at the top of the date I'd say they could tell it's a '89 , the only way to tell is to tpg it , since you don't want to it's a moot point . rzage