Worst filled die I've seen

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by toyz4geo, Jul 26, 2008.

  1. toyz4geo

    toyz4geo Member

    I found this in change. Have no idea what the date might be. The coin is dark across the middle, but much of Liberty and all of the date is gone.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    someone torch it?
     
  4. clembo

    clembo A closed mind is no mind

    Not an expert but it DOES appear someone did something horrible to that coin.
     
  5. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    It looks like a grease filled die to me. one of the best examples if so. Maybe Mike will see this post.
     
  6. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    Counterfeit IMO
     
  7. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    yeah, it almost does look fake
     
  8. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    where is Mike?

    Greased die, to me.
     
  9. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    My guess...A FAKE

    Bruce
     
  10. toyz4geo

    toyz4geo Member

    Thanks for the imput. I figured if it had been torched, the copper plating would bubble. If it had been ground on, there would be zinc showing. I am submitting another photo with better lighting to see if it adds anything to determine if it is real or fake.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. nikki

    nikki Junior Member

    Wow, the dates completely gone, when you look at it from straight on. You can barely make out 195...but I cant make out the last digit at all. What is filled die. *~*SMILE*~* nikki
     
  12. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I have to go with grease. From the most recent pics, looks like a '94.
     
  13. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    I still stick by Counterfeit, The letters and numbers look off. the lines on his jacket are to clear..
    just looks weird.
     
  14. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Counterfeit? Why? If you mean post mint altered, there is a .005" coating of copper over the entire coin. I do not think that they could do that much "damage" without disturbing the copper coating.

    As for the date, I vote for a 1996. If you look at the last digit, it rises above the level of the nines. The 6 is the only digit that is above level.
     
  15. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    No I mean counterfeit.
    The coin doesnt look real IMO
     
  16. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    its definitly a 1994, you can see it in the 2nd picture
     
  17. TheOracle

    TheOracle Member

    I don't see how this is a fake. I have some like it. In fact I have one where only the 1 is showing on the date. If someone torched it, it would look much worse. Why would someone counterfeit this cent?
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Counterfeit would be the wrong word - altered coin would be the coreect term.

    As to why - to induce someone who could not recognize an altered coin to buy it.

    That said, I am not saying it is or isn't.
     
  19. clembo

    clembo A closed mind is no mind

    The close ups really sway me toward alteration.

    Notice how the "weak" areas tend to be much darker? Can't say how it was done but it sets off flags in my camp.
     
  20. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Put me down as 1994 and grease filled die.

    I don't see it as an alteration because I see no way to remove those features post mint. You can't grind or smooth them off of a cold coin without destroying the copper plating. If you were to heat it to close to 800 degrees, the zinc inside will soften or even melt but if you then try to press out the letters you would find that the copper shell would still want to retain its form and you would wind up a dented and distorted surface rather than the smooth surfaces this coin has.
     
  21. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    is the coin the proper diameter and weight?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page