What would you grade it?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by prolawn_care, Dec 15, 2010.

  1. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    What would you grade this 1953-S silver quarter? It's in an older NGC slab, and i think it's over graded personally, but not sure...

    1953-S NGC 001.jpg

    1953-S NGC 002.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    I would grade it AMV- About Melt Value.

    Seriously though, the photos aren't really sharp enough. Somewhere in the lower VF range?
     
  4. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    Yeah pics are bad, but the coin isnt very impressive, but would you believe me if i told you it was an MS grade?
     
  5. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Yes, that looks to be an MS grade, and likely a fairly high grade, but that is mostly a guess with those pictures.
     
  6. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    Ok here's some better pics: (i hope)


    1953-S NGC 004.jpg
    1953-S NGC 005.jpg
    1953-S NGC 006.jpg
     
  7. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Those pix still leave a bit to be desired, but I cannot find a nick on it. Eye appeal is not top of the scale, but the rest is. Quarters are not my area, but I would guess 66?
     
  8. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    Given those photos probably yes.

    1953-S NGC 006.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  9. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    It's a clean coin as far as nicks and what not go, but it seems to have a residue from a fire or something on it...? I'm not sure it's toning. But when i found it at the flea market i had to look pretty good at it to even be able to tell what it was. I got it at a good pice ($4.75) but not sure i could give it away the way the residue or toning is on it...

    It's graded at MS-65 from NGC. Is it worth sending it back in to be re-evaluated for a possiable 66?

    1953-S NGC 003.jpg
     
  10. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Even if we are right, you are going to spent $20+ in shipping to get a coin worth $20 more than the 65 you have now. i.e., you are going to lose even if you get it graded for free.
     
  11. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    Kind of what i was thinking, not worth it, but whats the price difference between 65 and 66? I cant seem to find the price of a 66 anywhere... I think i'll probably just hold on to it just the way it is.
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

  13. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    Ok instead of posting a new thread, i figured i just post some pics and ask your opinion of the grades of some more quarters that i recently picked up:

    1961 Silver quarter
    varoius MS+ quarters 005.jpg varoius MS+ quarters 004.jpg varoius MS+ quarters 003.jpg

    1971-S I pulled it from a proof set (the proof set with the s nickel)

    varoius MS+ quarters 001.jpg varoius MS+ quarters 007.jpg

    1976-S Bi-centennial silver clad quarter:
     
  14. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    1976-S Bi-centennial silver clad quarter:
    varoius MS+ quarters 002.jpg varoius MS+ quarters 008.jpg
    [​IMG]
     
  15. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

  16. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    My first take on the 61 is that it is proof, but you camera is shaking just enough for me not to know for sure. I may be able to guess MS coins, but not PR's.

    As for the 76-S, I would go 65 and if there is enough luster, maybe 66.
     
  17. jallengomez

    jallengomez Cessna 152 Jockey

    I'm thinking proof on that 61 also, especially since it appears to be a type B proof reverse. Could be a type B business strike, but it looks an aweful lot like a proof.
     
  18. prolawn_care

    prolawn_care New Member

    Here's a side shot of the 61, i'm really hoping it's not a proof! I like the higher MS grade prices!

    varoius MS+ quarters.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page