What is going on with this 1942 Type 2 nickel proof?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by iPen, Mar 8, 2016.

  1. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Does anyone know what is going on along the bottom rim area of this 1942 Type 2 Jefferson proof nickel? It looks like a series of tooling marks, but the PR-68 grade given by PCGS tells me otherwise. What would have caused that at the Mint?

    Thanks in advance!

    Pic from the 'net.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Huh . . . I'm stumped!
     
    iPen likes this.
  4. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Me too, especially since it's a proof!

    It's like a reverse cud but in shorter successions, or a polish / grease-filled series of lumps.
     
  5. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    I've seen that on a couple Jeffersons in the past but they were circulated so I assumed it was PMD but this being proof IDK what would've caused this. I'm curious myself.
     
  6. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    I forget the technical name for it but it's a type of lamination, where the raised or upset edge of the planchet is folded over during striking.
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2016
    Paddy54 and paddyman98 like this.
  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Same thing I'm thinking.. how about this.. Proofs are struck twice. First strike has enough High Pressure to maybe cause a slightly raised Finned Rim then the second strike would fold the Finned Rim down onto the field of the Nickel. And that could be what we are seeing?
     
    Paddy54, Hommer and saltysam-1 like this.
  8. Hommer

    Hommer Curator of Semi Precious Coinage

    I read somewhere that if the blank is unusually thick, the upsetting mill will sometimes fold the edge over.
     
    Paddy54 and paddyman98 like this.
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Paddy, wouldn't a finned rim occur on the outer edge of the rim? If so, shouldn't there be evidence of the fold-over somewhere on the rim itself?

    Chris
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  10. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    It looks like the upsetting machine may have had too much pressure and rolled the rims too much resulting in a planchet slightly smaller in diameter with higher than normal rims that started to roll in towards the center of the planchet, similar to spooning a coin. The die's being proof dies, I assume have very sharp edges and probably shaved some of the rim on the first strike like a chisel. The shaved metal from the inner part of the rim was then flattened out even more on the second strike resulting in the slightly curved look to the anomaly. Of course this is all just theory.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  11. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I'm on board with jtlee321 on this one . I have seen this before only on the softer nickel coins, meaning type two nickels I also had a roll of Franklin half's unc. That had the same issue. I would agree this was probably one of the first minted proofs in 42.... in the silver compound used for these nickels. And the upsetting machine was not adjusted to the alloy change.
    Thus it was set for pre war nickel alloys when turning up the rim. If you look closely it just about 360 around the coins rim.
     
  12. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Now my next question is this.....How can a damaged coin no matter pmd or damaged at the mint in proof state be graded and graded in a high grade of 68?


    Can we see the reverse also?
     
  13. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    If interested there is a very nice raw 1942 type 2 proof Jefferson on the bay right now that is a vary rare variety.
    WDDR-003 this variety value is well worth over $300 in Pr-65.
    Here's a image of the coin. BTW not my coin I don't sell or buy on ebay. :)
    The coin is listed under $100. So graded be a good flip. A great cherry pick :)
    I say at least an R-4 maybe a 5!

    s-l400.jpg s-l400-1.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2016
  14. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    It is the edge of the gasket of the slab extending over the rim of the coin.
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  15. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Bingo that's it I knew I've seen this before but couldn't place it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2016
  16. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

  17. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Did it already sell?

    I don't see it but that may just be due to my search terms.

    Otherwise, I'll stick with a different one.
     
  18. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Here's the other side:

    [​IMG]
     
  19. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    I will look probably not as most people don't know about the ddr

    No the coin is no longer listed on e bay.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2016
  20. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Paddy, you mention it was a Type 2 WDDR-003 but the photo's you posted from the auction are a Type 1. Was your post a typo and meant to be Type 1 WDDR-003?
     
  21. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    No my post is correct what is wrong is the image. I have so many images on my computer of nickels in general. I posted the wrong images . Thanks for the heads up my bad. You are correct the WDDR -003 is a type 2 not 1 . And the images I posted are not of the nickel I coped and saved. Thanks for the catch. no longer listed on e bay. The same seller had several 42 proofs listed maybe they sold maybe he'll re list them.
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2016
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page