What a fake?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by tammiGee, Dec 27, 2018.

  1. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    19_3-_ Steel remains of a copper coat NO damage to wheat ears rev. WIN_20181227_18_31_59_Pro.jpg WIN_20181227_18_33_49_Pro.jpg WIN_20181227_18_32_58_Pro.jpg WIN_20181227_18_33_31_Pro.jpg WIN_20181227_18_33_14_Pro.jpg
     
    Hookman likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    What are we thinking there , Tammi ?

    I'm not sure what I'm looking at except that it appears a number was removed from the date.

    I see the " ghost " of an 8 or 3 or 5 ???

    A 5 would make the most sense ???
     
  4. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    steel....according to my magnet @Hookman
     

    Attached Files:

  5. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    I believe it is a real 1943 steel cent that was copper plated and then corroded. Commonly found back in the hey-day of discovery of copper real one. copper43.JPG
     
    Santinidollar and paddyman98 like this.
  6. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    wouldn't that have been highly illegal back in the day? This one is scattered with the remains of a coat and like I showed the rev. is in good shape so maybe not parking lot damage but PMD at its best
     
  7. SchwaVB57

    SchwaVB57 Well-Known Member

    Here is an example. I bought a roll in the 60's. IMG_0347.JPG IMG_0348.JPG
     
  8. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    The ad is from 1963 Numismatic Scrapbook monthly magazine. Like some of current products ( Carr) as long as the underlying coin is real, you can manipulate it I guess. Jim
     
    ldhair and SchwaVB57 like this.
  9. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    Hmmmmm
     
  10. robec

    robec Junior Member

    It is definitely not a 3. All the 3's from the 1930's were in a different font. The 3 was short and squatty.

    And it couldn't be an 8 since there are no wheat cents from the 1980's

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    Ergo ,
    " A 5 would make the most sense ".

    However, I'm not seeing it clear enough to be sure of anything.
     
  12. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    steel=magnetic material=1943 Lincoln Cent without the mintmark would be that much less to explain
     
  13. Hookman

    Hookman Well-Known Member

    I apologize Tammi, I missed your 2nd post about it being magnetic.

    Yes, you are correct, Ma'am !
     
  14. Clawcoins

    Clawcoins Damaging Coins Daily

    They still coat/plate the wazoo out of US coins and anything that they can sell to the public for a profit.

    here's one of *many*, *many* places that plate coins
    https://www.merrickmint.com/24k-gold-plated-coins.html

    you can still get plated steel cents (various platings available from various places) too .... Black RUTHENIUM 1943 Genuine Steel Wartime Wheat Penny U.S. Coin with 24K Clad Lincoln Portrait
    upload_2018-12-28_19-26-22.png

    You just have to spend $10 for a 1 cent valuation.
     
    Hookman likes this.
  15. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    For some reason the 4 on 1943 steel cents was a favorite place for the die to become clogged resulting in 19 3 cents. You see them fairly frequently. As for the rest of the coin I'm not seeing a copper coating. I suspect breaks in the zinc plating and the steel is developing an iron oxide layer. Red rust.
     
    Oldhoopster likes this.
  16. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Sorry double post
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page