This is a set of threads that I started over at CU when CT land was down. These were a few toners I bought last week and got anxious when I couldn't get your opinion here. Here is the 3rd of them. These were found in a roll that has been stored away for about 10+ years. I will post the other 2 over the weekend. I would love to hear your opinions below. Phil
Looks to be an AU58, but that is hands-down the prettiest AU58 I have ever seen. If it had no wear, the thing could easily get a 65! Edit: This AU58 gains its beauty, to me, through its toning and die cracks.
A beautiful coin. I had to think what WDYGI meant and I took it to mean What Did You Grade It. It looks like a little west on the high spots so I went AU-58. The toning is great.
WGYDI. “Where Did You Get It?” Or is it “Why did You Get It,” or “When Did You Get It?” I’ll answer, but IHTKF (“I Have To Know First”). Thanks.
Very nice coin to me. But, the breast on the reverse makes AU58 mandatory if the photo lighting shows it correctly.
if not for the lil bit of rub on the hair (over the ear most visible and i did have to compare it to my 84 to be sure) I would call it 63 maybe 64 with fantastic toning... but rub is rub so AU58 she is Still an absolutely stunning toned morgan
"What do you grade it!" Let me see if I can get some better more correct tones. It's Lustrous. The coin is bluer and redder, and has much deeper lustre.
A tad 'baggy' on the obverse so I'm at '63. If it's graded I'll bet they gave it a two point handicap.......
We all wood! I am thankful I got a job that pays the bills. I am getting older and I have been lucky to have found only a few boss's that let me make them money. Those are good folks!
MS 62....a little baggy to go higher and I don't think I see any wear (if there is a bit of rub, I could still see it being a 62 slider).
