That isn't a cud Cuds do not have any design details. It looks like a struck thru compacted grease. Also why is the Copper plating pealing? Maybe I am just having a hard time reading the photos.
The copper is not peeling. It is all solidly intact. I did weigh it. It's 2.5 grams. I can't find anything that looks like it to reference from. Thanks for the reply. Should I try to get a better picture?
First, how do you know this is from 2000 or afterwards? The mint started making these in 1982. Next, they have a thin copper coating and from the photos it appears to me that either the copper coating is peeling or this is some sort of a lamination on a copper coated zinc planchet, something I have not seen. Try taking a couple more photos from different angles and lighting. Since I’ve never seen this before I’m concerned about the coin looking copper, being copper on zinc and a large piece missing. Some of the design is faintly there. And lastly, welcome to CT. @Fred Weinberg @paddyman98 @JCro57
Now. I can see that it is raised. The details of lincolns jacket, a partial date, and rim detail, says that this is IMO a pre cud. Post 2010 Fun Coin @Necoins
you can send it to me to examine and take HD photos. I don't charge. just pay for shipping to me and then to send it back to you ($7)
This was posted on reddit the other day. Not 100% sure it's OP's coin but if not that's quite the coincidence: https://www.reddit.com/r/CRH/comments/qxpesq/found_in_hubbys_pocket_change/
I'm thinking it's die subsidence associated with a cracked die. It would still show some detail in the sunken area. https://www.error-ref.com/die-subsidence/
You may be correct. I’m at my antique shop so not totally focused on coins. The last four days I sold over $600.00 and nothing was $30.00. Lots to do before Black Friday and the weekend. Good thing we’re closed.