Unique reverse types

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Valentinian, Jun 11, 2017.

  1. Valentinian

    Valentinian Well-Known Member

    Some Roman imperial reverse types belong to a particular emperor. For example,
    VICTORIAGOTHIC.jpg
    You can tell who issued it just from the reverse.
    I added this to my educational page:
    http://augustuscoins.com/ed/unique/unique.html
    If you want to know who issued it, it is the first coin on the linked page.
    Click the pictures there to see the whole coin and its identification. There is no tally kept. Just enjoy seeing which of those coins you can identify from the reverse alone.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Is it purely the legend that makes it a sole emperor issue?
     
  4. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    GOTHIC can only be Claudius II. I have been looking for one of these for years.
     
    gregarious likes this.
  5. Valentinian

    Valentinian Well-Known Member

    No, it is the combination of legend and type. For example, the page has a type with legend CONCORDIA EXERCITVM. He was not the only emperor to use that legend, but the design with clasped hands and legionary standard set on a prow distinguishes the emperor.
     
  6. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Ahh. Thank you for the clarification.

    Can anyone place this one? Can you read it first?

    RI 064fi rev.jpg
     
  7. Valentinian

    Valentinian Well-Known Member

    It reads ARAB ADIABENIC. It is a type of Victory over the Arabs issued by Septimius Severus. RIC 466, "AD 195-196" IMP VII.

    It is a really good type for those interested in particular victories.
     
  8. gregarious

    gregarious E Pluribus Unum

    then we should help you find one:) (i'll be on the lQQkout:watching:)
     
    Pishpash likes this.
  9. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    What is your shortest unique to ruler legend? I have not researched this fully but is L Λ unique to Commodus? Is there a unique one letter legend?
    pa0540fd3416.jpg
     
  10. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Current thinking is that RIC is incorrect in citing any issues between IMP II and IMP VIII and that these are all mis-readings of IMP VIII legend breaks such as V-III, IMP VI-II and IMP VII-I.

    Septimius Severus was commemorating his victories over the Arabs and the Adiabenici but before his victory over the Parthians. We can then see later issues where he is PAR[THICVS] AR[ABICVS] AD[IABENICVS] before being declared PART[HICVS] MAX[IMVS] by the senate.

    Both my examples show how the mis-reading can occur.

    [​IMG]
    My second example has the additional oddity that the engraver seems to have forgotten to engrave the palm on this particular die.
    [​IMG]

    Regards,
    Martin.
     
  11. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    As long as we realize we are only talking about Laodicea, I believe this is correct. Rome has them all and IMP II is the hardest to get.

    The errors here came from coins like mine below which clearly reads IMP VI.
    rh2920bb1825.jpg
    However the coin below is equally clearly IMP VI II and uses the same obverse die. Can you see the very faint II under the bust on the first coin? With great imagination.....maybe?
    rh2930bb1365.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page