Thin Wheat Penny one sided 1925?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Jesse Hayes, Aug 16, 2020.

  1. Jesse Hayes

    Jesse Hayes New Member

    I found this penny in some old coins I have had for some time. The font looks lightly stamped or worn, and the backside looks like blank stock. It is also ~1/2 the thickness of a normal penny. To the lower left of lincoln, it looks like a 25 so I believe it to be a 1925 wheat penny.

    Any thoughts on if this coin is a minting error and if it has any value?
    IMG_0345.jpg IMG_0346.jpg IMG_0348.jpg
    Thank you
    Jesse
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    First, welcome to the neighborhood, Jesse!

    It is PMD. You can tell because there is no upset rim on the reverse. The upsetting mill applies the rim before the coin enters the coining chamber.
     
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Definitely damaged and welcome to CT.
     
    spirityoda and Jesse Hayes like this.
  5. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    Welcome aboard the CT Train, Jessie. The date could be 23, 25 or 28. My guess is 1923. I would call this coin horrifically worn. Nearly all the legends are non-existent on the coin. Definite not a Mint Error. Post Mint Damage, PMD with the probability of Environmental Damage, ED, added to the mix and a probable attempt at cleaning.
    I like these mystery coins and collected them for years. All gone now via a bulk sale a few years ago. I would keep it as a conversation piece. Good luck here on CT.
     
    Jesse Hayes likes this.
  6. Jesse Hayes

    Jesse Hayes New Member

    Thanks for welcoming to CT and for some of the feedback. The back of the coin doesn’t look like ware to me. The surface finish is too flat like a blank would be.
    But if it’s just worn than it’s worn from PMD.
     
    Robert Ransom likes this.
  7. Robert Ransom

    Robert Ransom Well-Known Member

    Mucho, mucho, mucho, el uso and on a scale of 1 to 10 and 1 being the worst, I would rate it a 1.5 and I have seen worse.
     
  8. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    Obviously someone sanded that cent down flat. Post mint damage.
     
    Collecting Nut and Robert Ransom like this.
  9. Mountain Man

    Mountain Man Well-Known Member

    Welcome to CT @Jesse Hayes. I love these oddities no matter how they got this way. It is definitely PMD and reminds me of a coin I found on the beach in Hawaii. Worn from being rubbed against the sand and surf for who knows how long.
     
    Jesse Hayes likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    The reverse has been ground flat then buffed to be smoother. Having no rim is the clue to this type of damage.
     
    spirityoda and Jesse Hayes like this.
  11. Mcdee1973

    Mcdee1973 New Member

    Definitely worn still pretty cool though I've got one similar thought you might want to take a look at it and give me your thoughts this is my first post so I have no idea what I'm doing IMG_20231006_184454.jpg IMG_20231006_184422.jpg
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  12. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Post Mint Damage. Physically altered.
    Welcome to CoinTalk! biggrin.gif
     
  13. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    Obverse ground down through the zinc substrate. That means your coin was minted between 1982 and 2008. A closer look at your reverse would establish what RDV is present which would narrow that range. It could be a useful exercise that may help you develop some coin sleuthing skills.

    welcome to CT.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page