Hard to tell anything decisively from the pictures. Weak or no D, as long as it hasn't been altered, should be a good one, correct? http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/3285 OP, you need much better pictures.
1922-D is a good date, although the condition of this coin is poor. It's not even a G-4. Less than $10. $25 in F.
Personally, I'd be of a different opinion if it can be determined to be a No D variety despite its less than stellar condition. It may be a Weak D that has been heavily worn, but, either should be able to be determined even in heavily worn condition. Again, I can't tell enough from its very poor pix to paint it with 'less than G-4' paint and haven't seen the back yet either. I really don't even want to if any additional pictures offered are as low quality as those so far produced.
There are at least 4 die pairs that the 1922 is associated with die pair #2 is the most desirable and is known as a strong reverse and is without the D, AKA 1922 Plain, Dies #1,#3, & #4 are known as weak reverse, with weak or no D. Until the reverse of the coin is displayed no conclusive evidence is visible. Based on the discoloration and image provided without the reverse I am going with weak d
Based on the image provided that I see, with or without the reverse, I'd almost wonder if my display or graphics card was failing if I didn't know better.
What type of display or device are you using to view these? Both are the same exact 768x768 images. Same file name even.
The inner part of the quarter is 100% copper, but the outer edges are 75% copper and 25% nickel. When they corrode the copper dominates in corrosion.