The other 2 busties - attribution help please

Again, anything special about these? And again I will go VG and F (details, anyway)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Nope both look normal to me the first one is really bad not worth much of anything !! first i usually don't even graded holed coins !! second one would get f details i believe !!

 

I think he was asking about the die variety of the coin

 

I know i am saying i do not believe either are a valuable die variety !

 

So do you know which Overton they are?

 

Not sure on die variety the first is a holy half worth silver melt second I'd call vg possibly details due to the scrapes not sure how sever they are in hand the first 2 were nicer but as a whole you got some nice halts and you can never go wrong with multiple nice busts

 

No one know Overton numbers any more?

 

1831 looks like an o-116. M above right base of A left side of shield looks like a broad double line. Star 8 1 mm from cap and s13 1/2 mm from curl.

 

I can't get a read on the 1836 - seems like not everything wants to line up for me.

 

Thanks for trying!

 

The 1836 is a pain to Overton.

Possibly the O-122.

stem & C align, as well as the I T relationship.

Plus the 6 is higher than the 183.

R-2

RLM: You ask: No one know Overton numbers any more?

Sure, but esp for some dates it takes a lot of time.

 

Hey Frank if I blow it up it looks like the left side of I lines up with the right side of the T. Or that is how it looks to me - maybe my eyes need adjusting.

 

agreed, and that is how it is listed in Peterson's and, possibly, in Overton.

 

In my 4th edition by Parsley for the 122 it says I is centered under right side of T. So that is why I skipped 122. But if I use a magnifying glass on the picture it sure looks like left side of I lines up with right side of T. So I guess the overton book could be wrong.