I'm not sure I understood the question. I can read "copy," however, at which point my interest wanes.
Not sure what they're looking for here with this copy Morgan. As far as color, the reverse looks closer to natural than the obverse. Olive green toning isn't a natural color on any coin. As far as the copy stamp goes, it's not even needed on most fake Morgans as they never get the relief right on worn coins. Guy~
WOW a 1964 Peace Dollar, that is rare, and a D mint at that! Wish I had me one of those:whistle::whistle::whistle::whistle:
Back to original post... The back of the color is unnatural... That sentence doesn't make sense Are you saying that your worries with this coin, are of the unnatural surfaces... Well it probably toned that way, because it is not even silver, and has been cleaned in something And, marked COPY..
Hey guys... I suggest that we don't comment on the piece any more. The people who make these counterfeits that are flooding the coin market and ripping people off are using these boards to try to perfect their pieces. If they can post a coin here and get our comments about why it looks fake and why it looks bad, they may use them to make their fakes better and then in turn you might be helping them make a better counterfeit. There was an old saying in WWII "loose lips sink ships". I think that phrase rings true here.
Coin looks great just like it is. Can you make it a little darker green though? Maybe look like PVC damage. I think that would help your cause. Also another thing that may help is to Change the word Trust to Trvst.
