some outargeous errors i got at auburn coin show today!!!!

got a super-fantastic deal on these coins, plus there were 4 or 5 more i wanted, but over budget, also got a half roll of eagle cents and 1/4 roll cupro nickel indians...now for the coins i got todat at the auburn, ma coin show....

1918 au-brown lincoln with severe retained lamination on reverse...

1943 steel cent xf-40 5 % off center...

continued>>>>>

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

1980-s susan b anthony with clip at k-6, unc
1972 kennedy half dollar struck through grease obverse with clip @k-3

 

@john65999 I like those laminations on old wheat cents. I found a bunch of them when I was a kid. Nice photos too.

 

stay till the end (saving the best for last)...1926-d double cl;ip buffalo nickel with lamination obverse and improper alloy mix & struck through grease top of reverse

 

1971-d, mad, with slight collar clash on rim, clip @ k-4, unc ike and finnaly the best for last!!!! a 1971, struck on dime stock (weight 4.3 grams) washington quarter, with reverse clad layer missing unc (rim is 99% coppery & shiny nice..got another ike but posting that separately.. (ws bidding just now on a clipped samoa quarter, i bid 97.50 then 110.00 it went of 170.00, darn darn darn, next time gonna bid 250.00 and get that elusive coin...

 

Very nice wheat off-center. I like it.
Thanks for sharing!

 

woops, forgot the junk box (5.00) ike that is struck through grease, a 1949-d junk bin (1.00) Lincoln cent with lamination and a slabbed1989 off center clashed dies Lincoln cent in ms-64 red

first the ike, it is in a first day cover (of sorts) gonna bust him out for the error that he is!! it is struck through (slight) obverse and rev by left of main devices...

the 49-d is rim to rim and also has a small struck through (lamination??) at base of lincoln's coat ( on second thought, might just leave it in the holder for now, i will remember why i have it, more pics in next post..

 

here is a pic ot the1989 ms-64 off center clashed die cent in anacs holder
and a picture of what are left of the flyiong eagle cents and indian cents that i bought, sold 1 of each to a young numismatist, and 10 f/e to another dealer....

 

this is the one i did not get, bids shot to174.00 grrr

https://www.ebay.com/itm/125027684939?ssPageName=STRK:MEBIDX:IT&nma=true&si=dKYoz0Z7WRMmjLta7orHV7IoWuQ%3D&orig_cvip=true&nordt=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557

 

It hammered at 174. Possibly a coin dealer picked it up... we'll see once it is slabbed and comes out onto the market again.

 

i really wanted it, i bid 97.50 at 3 seconds, then it jumped to 110, i then bid 125.00 and it ended at 174, grrr, next time just gonna bid like 300...i do much better at coin shows, today i got over 700.00 retail in errors for 180.00 and a lot of cool stuff...wish i had more $$$ would of bought this guy out...

 

Wow i couldn't imagine what a W quarter with a clip like this would sell for.

 

I have faced similar situations before. Paid a large sum of money on one coin, and not much budget left for upcoming ones.

 

It would fetch quite an amount after it is slabbed, considering a "W" mint, and a recent date of 2020.

 

not mine, but i found this beauty off facebook, pretty cool lam

 

here is one for ya: $129.00 + free ship, bin struck through "w" error

https://www.ebay.com/itm/2036774850...jRgqMyv7QMhIbqySKzP8WFqG_7l8BozEaAksXEALw_wcB

 

he has a bunch of 'w" errors from 129-1000 $$$

 

Not struck on dime stock, too heavy. Just missing the clad layer. If it was just struck on dime stock the weight would be believable (~ 4.16 grams) but then losing the clad layer would reduce the weight by another .66 grams so 3.5 grams.

A quarter losing a clad layer would be ~4.76 grams Which strikes me as being closer to your coin.

 

ok, was judt going by what dealer had on label....still a pretty coin...

 

Most missing clad errors are the result of an insecure bond of the clad layer(s). The weight of the coin in question is an important piece of data to know in making the attribution. I have calculated the weights of single clad layers which would be helpful in understanding the weight such a coin should show. The exception is that a coin which is missing a clad layer because of a rolling error in the bonding mill which leaves only one clad layer on the coin instead of two. Such a coin will be normal weight and thickness.
by pete apple from ccf
so..as above says, if rolled on stock where just the cladding is missing and weight would be the same as a normal coin, is it possible this happened this way, (not trying to argue, just is it possible?)