So 92 d cam and 94 d cam am I correct on the errors

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Italy8686, Jan 14, 2022.


Cam or not

  1. Yes

    0 vote(s)
  2. No

    2 vote(s)
  1. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest

    to hide this ad.
  3. charley

    charley Well-Known Member

    No, for some reason, I don't think so, and not because of the photos.
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  4. Mark68

    Mark68 Well-Known Member

    94 is correct. 92 looks like a winner. Nice find!
    JPD3 and SensibleSal66 like this.
  5. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    What the.. Who the...:confused::wacky::yawn:
    CoinJockey73 and Mark68 like this.
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Close A M
  7. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

    But it's ugly though
  8. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    The '92 looks OK.
    FYI, it is not an error, it is a variety with many the same struck
    Italy8686 likes this.
  9. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    I'm not convinced its real,can you get closer pictures of the FG.
  10. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Many of them?I think your getting confused PCGS has only certified 5 of the d's and a few dozen of the Phillys out of the billions minted.
    expat likes this.
  11. Incharge

    Incharge Active Member

    1992 close am. FG is further away from the building.. $$$$
    Italy8686 and potty dollar 1878 like this.
  12. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Yes even in the shape for the op's example this could be hundreds to possibly a few thousand and up(get it certified).
  13. JPD3

    JPD3 Well-Known Member

    Italy8686 likes this.
  14. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

    And I read pcgs article it says nothing about how many we're released to the public, but only that they found and verified 5 92d 1c.
  15. Mark68

    Mark68 Well-Known Member

    JPD3 likes this.
  16. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

    2 more I need checking on IMG_1992.jpg IMG_1991.jpg IMG_1984.jpg IMG_1985.jpg IMG_1987.jpg IMG_1988.jpg
  17. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

    And I can't remember if I showed this one or not. If it was a spread or MD. It's another 92 d I found FB_IMG_1635918890580.jpg FB_IMG_1635918879718.jpg FB_IMG_1635918882066.jpg FB_IMG_1635918884922.jpg FB_IMG_1635918887869.jpg
  18. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

    The 68d looks like an rpm, idk anything about mercury dimes and 1933 liberty copy what does that
  19. Italy8686

    Italy8686 Italy8686

  20. JPD3

    JPD3 Well-Known Member

    Good Pics.

    The dime is a Baber, not a S mint that I can see. Value tops maybe $4. Definitely place that one in a 2x2.

    The Liberty 1933 copy type is selling for about $10 on e-bay.

    The 1968 D cent runs about 5 cent in that condition. It looks like the E in Liberty took a small hit. There are 7 RPMs for that date/MM in Variety Vista and 2 listed in Brian's Varieties. See if yours matches by a detailed side-by-side copy & paste comparison.
    1968-D RPMs (

    Brian's Variety Coins - 1968-1989 One Cent Repunched Mintmarks (

    If the edge of the 1992 D isn't damaged or nicked and it's not a plating blister, then that spot on the rim might be the start of a pre-cud.
  21. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    I really need better pics of that 92, If that is the real deal then wow congrats. I have searched for that beast for years.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page