Snopes Disspells Myths & Urban Legends About Redesigned $5 & $10

Discussion in 'Paper Money' started by Hobo, Apr 9, 2008.

  1. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Nothing makes people look at their money like a redesign. And with each redesign we see a new round of misinformation, half truths and lies as well as the usual myths and urban legends.

    The latest redesign of the $5 and $10 notes caused rumors of "printing errors" (because the date of release does not correspond with the bills' Series date). Snopes sets the record straight here.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. clembo

    clembo A closed mind is no mind

    Snopes

    Good Thread Hobo.

    Snopes is great for so much more than currency and coins.

    Every "forwarded" email I get usually ends up at snopes because so much of it is BS.

    PS

    I do NOT work for Snopes - just really appreciate the site.

    clembo
     
  4. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Snopes is GREAT! I have used them for many years. Like you, I check the validity of a lot of stuff I get in e-mail. I also like to check Snopes before I e-mail or post something on-line so I don't embarrass myself by spreading a myth or urban legend. (I wish more people did that.)
     
  5. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    any email i get that sounds too outrageous to be true... is usually followed up by a visit to snope... and yes, they are always posted there as being fake, false and just plainly made up!

    great post Hobo!
     
  6. FHDave

    FHDave Senior Member

    Of course, you have to check emails there even when they claim that they have already been "validated" by Snopes. I have had a series of emails lately that come with the "I've checked this on Snopes" claim in the email. When you check them yourselves, they turn out to be as false as most of the chain emails are.
     
  7. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Will read it, thanks for the post!!!
     
  8. gatzdon

    gatzdon Numismatist

    two things in that snopes that standout.

    They generically say there are no printing errors. There are always printing errors, just none associated with engraving the wrong series date.

    They state that coins are dated the year they are minted. Actually, they are dated the year they are issued (many state quarters may be minted in December-January for release in February). Although, the mint bucked that trend big time in 1964 through 1967. I'm sure there are also many documented instances in the 1800's where coins were minted with a different date, but I think many of those weren't officially sanctioned by the mint.
     
  9. Numbers

    Numbers Senior Member

    It's a good bit more complex than that....

    In the earliest years of the Mint, they usually punched the current year into the dies when they were made, but a die might well be used as long as several years later, leading to backdated coins. Later on, the regular-production coins were dated with the year of minting, but as you noted, a lot of under-the-table production of backdated coins went on, so that the Mint workers could sell them to collectors at a profit.

    Sometime in the mid-1800's (I forget the date), Congress finally passed a law prohibiting the Mint from making any backdated coins. Since the law didn't say anything about dating coins *ahead*, it eventually became traditional for the Mint to switch to the new year's date in mid-late December, rather than waiting for January 1 (that way, if they overestimated how many dies they'd need to finish off the old year's coinage, they'd have a couple weeks to use up the extras before December 31, after which date they couldn't legally be used). It's not a matter of issue dates, though; often some of the old-year coins remain to be paid out in the new year, and on rarer occasions the first of the new-year coins are issued while it's still December.

    A few exceptions to the no-backdating rule have been made since then by direct order of Congress, though. The 1964-1967 mess was one of those, but several of the commemorative coins in the '30s were also backdated, and so was at least one modern commem (the 1993 Jefferson dollar, minted 1994). In each case, Congress specifically mandated what date the Mint had to put on the coins; the Mint doesn't have authority to backdate any coins of its own volition.

    But in any case, "dated the year they're minted" is a good first approximation of the situation with coins--as opposed to currency, *most* of which ends up being backdated a year or two due to the series-dating method the BEP uses. I think that was the only point Snopes was trying to make.... :rolleyes:
     
  10. gatzdon

    gatzdon Numismatist

    Thanks for the clarification Numbers. You are a walking encyclopedia (whereas the rest of us just try to use a little trivia to look smart).

    Thanks
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page