Most likely a 2020 shield cent as we’ve seen major strike thrus on that date ranging from size and characteristics in this same area. From the feeder fingers. (Field restricted strike thru)
Lamination arrows can’t happen on zincolns. this is a know type of strike thru (field restricted strike thru) the area missing when the coin was struck was due to the grease and debris on the die itself. It’s raised on the so the strike thru will be incuse and deep/concave depending on how much substance was on the die.
Why? Does not the zinc have to be rolled thin like copper. And aren't there multiple chemicals that go in the mix. So why couldn't there be imperfections that cause laminations? Please explain your statement to me.
This was written by Pete Apple very well known and knowledgable on coins has written many articles. I have never seen a lamination on a copper plated zinc cent. If someone has a photo of one, please post it here in this thread! Or if someone has a link to a discussion of such a lamination, please post it. In the meantime I have been working on a paper which attempts to understand and explain why it is that so few or none exist. Any critiques or comments are welcome! (Careful...the paper is a bit lengthy!) LAMINATIONS Lamination errors occur on copper alloy cents, but not on copper plated zinc cents. These laminations occur because of a planchet defect caused by impurities or internal stresses in the alloy which causes metal to separate along horizontal planes of weakness. Lamination flaws occur when impurities or foreign materials or gas become trapped within the planchet metals as they are being formed or are the result of an inadequately mixed alloy.¹ Copper alloy cents are 95% copper and 5% tin and zinc (until 1962 when the cent’s tin content, which was quite small, was removed). Thus the amount of the minority metal was sufficient to create separation along horizontal planes if the alloy was not mixed properly. Copper plated Zinc Cents are composed of Zinc Alloy 190 electroplated with 8 microns of copper. Zinc Alloy 190 contains 0.005% max Lead; 0.010% max Iron; 0.005% max Cadmium; 0.7% to 0.9% Copper; and 99.08% Zinc. I think that the supply of minor metals is insufficient to be reflected as an inadequate alloy mix capable of producing a lamination. In addition, Zinc strip - as it is being processed for rolling into coils – has lubrication applied to it which leads to improved surface finish, as well as distributing a corrosion-protective barrier on the strip.² This lubrication giving added protection serves to further prevent corrosion induced laminations from developing. In addition the hardness of Zinc Cents is a bit less than the hardness of copper cents which also serves to prevent lamination in Zinc Cents. The Hardness of copper cents = ~76 on the Rockwell 15-T scale and a range of “Hardness between 62 and 72 Rockwell 15T are [sic] considered nominal (standard) for RTS planchets [note: planchets for all denominations] at the United States Mint.” (RTS= Ready to Strike).³ I have had hardness tests run with these results: "The actual 15T Rockwell Hardness on this 1976D was measured at 75.2" and "The actual value on this 2000-D was measured at 59.1."⁴ I think that the primary reason, however, we do not see lamination on Zinc Cents is that the Interfacial Free Energy for Zinc is significantly less than for Copper, which would explain why Copper after being rolled is more subject to delamination than is Zinc. “The surface energy defined as the surface excess free energy per unit area of a particular crystal facet is one of the basic quantities in surface physics. It determines the equilibrium shape of mezoscopic crystals, it plays an important role in faceting, roughening, and crystal growth phenomena, and may be used to estimate surface segregation in binary alloys.”⁵ This can also be seen when examining the Metallic Crystalline Structure. The Metallic Crystalline Structure of Copper is face centered cubic (FCC) structure and The Metallic Crystalline Structure of Zinc is hexagonal close packed (HCP) structure. Both have a packing factor of 0.74, consist of closely packed planes of atoms, and have a coordination number of 12. The difference between the FCC and HCP is the stacking sequence. The HCP layers cycle among the two equivalent shifted positions whereas the FCC layers cycle between three positions. Cubic lattice structures allow slippage to occur more easily than non-cubic lattices, so HCP metals are not as ductile as the FCC metals. The impact on the slip system (slip planes and slip direction) of Copper is to increase the likelihood of consequent deformation mechanisms and delamination.⁶ “There are two more reasons why laminations are seldom seen in modern coins compared to earlier coins whether they are alloys or single metal. One is induction furnaces. In earlier gas or coal/coke fired furnaces the metal had to be stirred to mix the metals. This could lead to incomplete mixing, and/or introduction of contaminants into the melt. Or if stirred too vigorously before pouring the introduction of gas bubbles into the melt. Induction furnaces are self-stirring. The moving field lines through the metal provides a mixing action and encourages convection cells that help bring gas bubbled to the top where they can escape. Second is better ways of determining temperature. In the early years of the mint (until probably the latter half of the 20th century) they could only judge by eye based on the color of the melt. If the melt is too hot it is possible for bubbles to form in the melt from vaporizing metal. With today's modern sensors it is possible to take the melt to a specific temperature and hold it there allowing contaminates and gas bubbles time to rise to the surface where they can be skimmed with the dross and without vaporization. The result is a solid more uniform ingot.”⁷ A lamination can occur on clad coins, but such occurrence is rare. It can be recognized because it occurs in the clad layer itself and does not expose the copper core. A final observation which may be relevant, although it seems a bit counter-intuitive, is that the lower the Tensile Strength of a metal or metal alloy, the less likely a metal (alloy) is to produce laminations. Tensile strengths are: Tensile Strength (UTS) Incumbent Materials³ Cent: Copper Plated Zinc Tensile Strength = 26 ksi** Nickel: Cupronickel Tensile Strength = 96 ksi Quarter: Cupronickel-Clad C110 = 65.5 ksi There is a negative linear relationship between tensile strength and adjusted delamination factor.⁸ *UTS = Ultimate Tensile Strength **kilopound per square inch Footnotes: (1) http://www.error-ref.com/ (2) Jarden Zinc - Technical Brief: Lubrication of Solid Zinc Strip (3) ALTERNATIVE METALS STUDY Contract Number: TM-HQ-11-C-0049 FINAL REPORT August 31, 2012 by Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Submitted to: United States Mint, Page 42. (4) "Rockwell Hardness Test Marks On Lincoln Cents by Pete Apple https://conecaonline.org/rockwell-h...I4PRP6lKDwfy0itL3C_1uF6dKULYj3Wl5jnIRxzZ0gh2s (5) Surface Science 411 (1998) 186–202: The surface energy of metals by L. Vitos, A.V. Ruban, H.L. Skriver, J. Kolla´r ---Center for Atomic-scale Materials Physics and Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark, Research Institute for Solid State Physics, H-1525 Budapest, P.O. Box 49, Hungary Received 3 November 1997; accepted for publication 2 May 1998 (6) “Primary Metallic Crystalline Structures - Similarities and Difference Between the FCC and HCP Structure” https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Materials/Structure/fcc_hcp.htm (7) http://goccf.com/t/337498#2885808 (8) “Residual tensile strength monitoring of drilled composite materials by acoustic emission” by Navid Zarif Karimi, Hossein Heidary, Mehdi Ahmadi Non-destructive Testing Lab., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave.,15914 Tehran, Iran Journal of Materials and Design 40 (2012) 229-236. https://www.researchgate.net/public...lled_composite_materials_by_acoustic_emission
Thanks for posting that explanation. It is very informative and definitely answers my question. I will however still keep an eye out for a zinc lamination.
I am not sure what thread that came from Gorham. This is a Lincoln that has baffled me since I found it years ago in change or roll hunting. Part of it looks like a lamination crack and the area towards 6 looks like it is lifting from the surface. Could be just separation of the copper from zinc. Or rim to rim die crack that looks odd. Not sure. Isn't Pete a member here?
Pete is a memeber here yea. That thread I posted came from a facebook in a group. I’ve found a few of these searching as well. it’s defective copper plating.
