Severus Alexander denarius mint opinon

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by maridvnvm, Jan 31, 2020.

  1. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Hi all,
    I have acquired the following coin:-

    Severus Alexander Denarius
    Obv:- IMP C M AVR SEV ALEXAND AVG, Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right
    Rev:- SALVS PVBLICA, Salus seated, feeding serpent rising from altar
    3.11 g. 20.11 mm. 0 degrees.

    I think that it is from Antioch rather than Rome based on the style and lettering. The As also lack the horizontal bars. RIC 178 has the correct description for this coin, but it is from Rome. RIC 298 is Antioch but has the shorter obverse legend IMP SEV ALEXAND AVG and a star in the left field on the reverse.

    Am I correct with my thoughts on mint allocation or do I need to go back to studying again?

    RI 077bg img.jpg

    Regards,
    Martin
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. curtislclay

    curtislclay Well-Known Member

    Martin,

    Yes, you are correct. RIC and BMC are nowhere near complete in listing Eastern denarii of Severus Alexander.

    Your SALVS PVBLICA type is scarce, but turns up fairly frequently. Eauze 565-6 had two examples, one draped only, the other draped and cuirassed.

    Curtis
     
  4. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    I'm guessing you're not waiting with baited breath for a second opinion. :D

    Here's a common type for Antioch:
    Screen Shot 2020-01-31 at 12.43.22 PM.jpg
     
    Johndakerftw and Bing like this.
  5. maridvnvm

    maridvnvm Well-Known Member

    Many thanks Curtis. It confirmed opinion. I think that many sold as Rome are in fact Antioch.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page