Scans vs. Pics: 1913 Buffalo 5c, Type 2

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by C-B-D, Jul 2, 2017.

  1. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Nabbed this as a buy-it-now for $17! Sellers scans vs my pics. I gave it an acetone bath before. He called it AU, I say it's MS62. Nice luster in-hand. What do you think?
    s-l1600a-horz.jpg DSCN7818-horz.jpg
     
    jester3681, ldhair, tommyc03 and 6 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    That's a "He shoots! He scores!!!! Nice pick! :)
     
  4. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Nice woodie buff....
     
  5. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    First pic looks dry, small chem bath again on that one prob wash/burn it out.
    Second pic appears as digital pic that someone hit too hard with more than one of the software's offered effects.
    Not at all implying that it is, but for all I know it could be the same coin without done to it at all. Sorry. More pics might help
     
  6. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    *without anything done to it
     
  7. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Nice grab there.
     
  8. Dave M

    Dave M Francophiliac

    That seller's not doing himself any favors using a scanner...
     
    Ordinary Fool likes this.
  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Yeah great score.
    Nice Buffalo!
     
  10. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Um, I think you're on a different channel from the rest of us.

    The first images were from the seller, done on a scanner, not a camera. The second is a conventional digital-camera image. Both sets portray the same coin, unaltered.

    Coin cleaning isn't the only thing we discuss here... :rolleyes:
     
    imrich likes this.
  11. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    I believe you are correct. Did the second paragraph not make in with my post?
     
  12. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    Yes. Somehow I missed the part about the acetone bath. But I couldn't follow your comment about "small chem bath" -- it sounded like you were talking about treating a photographic negative, not a coin.
     
  13. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    I used to develop my own negatives, then enlarger, and move the paper down the line myself (Ilford anyone?). I should have wrote "quick", or "shorter time period" plus added that chems could be one or more in a solution usually depending on the alloy. Acetone is good, have you experimented with other ketones? Or other classes of organic molecules?
     
  14. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Might not of even got an acetone bath. Just a Photographer that knows his camera and lighting.
     
  15. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm at MS-63. Pretty coin.
     
  16. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    I must be communicating poorly.
     
  17. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    Or, not communicating my thoughts in a clear manner
     
  18. CheetoeWillie

    CheetoeWillie New Member

    Sorry to confuse, be well.
     
  19. jester3681

    jester3681 Exonumia Enthusiast

    I've gotten a few great deals thanks to scanner pics. I've probably given some too, before I got my camera set up.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page