Rpm?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by StandingPride95, Sep 6, 2012.

  1. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

    Hello all, I have another suspected here.

    RPm.jpg Please share thoughts...All of them!
     

    Attached Files:

    • RPm.jpg
      RPm.jpg
      File size:
      245.4 KB
      Views:
      112
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

  4. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    It doesn't match the one at Lincolncentresource. I can't find any others.
    Are you sure it's not split plate doubling or zinc rot?
     
  5. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

    No i checked what zinc rot looks like and itrs definitely not that, As for split plate doubling it doesn't look like the depressed kind or the one were it is zinc colored which is why i wasnt sure with this one.
     
  6. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Be patient. Someone (many) with more knowledge than I will be by soon to help you more.
     
  7. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    If it is, its very minor. I cannot see enough to say either way. Have you searched the online variety references - coppercoins, CONECA, doubleddie.com, etc? Being as you have the coin in-hand, if it is a repunch and any info is available, it should be easier for you to ID than it is for anyone here using photos.
     
  8. Hunt1

    Hunt1 Active Member

    Its not real i say!!!!!
     
  9. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

    I checked basically three types of searches and the hwole first page for each onee and i cannot find a match! though it looks a little like a less prominent WRPM 003
     
  10. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

    Well if thats all you can say I say I say you arent real!
     
  11. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    My CONECA reference above showed a RPM003. It looked nothing like your coin. You may, and I emphasize may, have a RPM. You might want to send it to CONECA for attribution.
     
  12. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

    Hrm i see well i will try getting one more close scan on the mintmark up and see if it "may" even be a legit repunched mintmark that "may" need to get attributed.
     
  13. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    Problem?
     
  14. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

  15. StandingPride95

    StandingPride95 New Member

  16. VDBforDave

    VDBforDave Lincoln Error Collector

    I'm gonna say not a RPM
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page