Possible double s

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by das7771, Jul 31, 2008.

  1. das7771

    das7771 New Member

    I purschased some s mint pennies about a year ago. Last night I finally started to go through them and noticed something. I found a 1954 s mint penny in at least ms-60 condition with some toning. Under a small hand held magnifying glass it seemed that the s was doubled. This morning I put it under my microscope to get a better look and to me it looks like it is really a double s. I am very amateur to coin collecting and by no means am I very good at this, but I do enjoy it. The top tip of the s cleary has two tips to it, and when the s curves to the front while moving down you can see a second part to it that appears to be some what of a black shadow. It does not appear to be caused by a worn die but an acutal double strike. I do not have pics at the moment but I will have some up tonight. If this is authentic does any one know what the value of this would be.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. snaz

    snaz Registry fever

    well, there is an RPM 1 triple punched MM from Denver for that year, but I can't seem to find anything from San Fransisco
     
  4. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Send us a picture Das.
     
  5. das7771

    das7771 New Member

    here is the pic

    Well here is the pic. This is the best I can do for now, but you can get a general idea of what I am talking about. I will mess with the camera some more and see if I can get a better pic later. Let me know what you thingk
     

    Attached Files:

  6. Captainkirk

    Captainkirk 73 Buick Riviera owner

    It looks to me like it is a die chip, not a doubled S.
     
  7. coinman101

    coinman101 Collector Of All Coins

    Hmmm, there seems to be something possible resembling the lower tip of an S protruding from the top of the bottom of the existing S. And considering that the "thing" resembling the upper tip of another S is protruding from the bottom of the top of the existing S; this would mean that the "extra S" would be smaller than the existing S. But that's just me rambling on with my "error imagination".
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page