Please explain the difference in mint marks

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Coolcoinz2014, Jan 20, 2017.

  1. Coolcoinz2014

    Coolcoinz2014 New Member

    Here are two pictures of 1948 S Mint Marks. How come one is so much fatter???
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Until 1990, mintmarks were hand-punched into the dies. I could be wrong, but in this instance, the slight difference between the two may be due to the pressure of the strike when putting the mintmark on the die. Since many mintmarks are tapered a bit, a lighter strike would produce a thinner mintmark while a heavier strike would produce a fatter mintmark. Like I said, I could be wrong and this is just a guess.

    Chris
     
    Johndoe2000$, ddddd and mikenoodle like this.
  4. mikenoodle

    mikenoodle The Village Idiot Supporter

    I think that you're exactly right, Chris
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  5. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Absolutely. There's also the possibility of normal surface subsidence/wear during the die's lifetime - as the die ages, the mint mark will appear "smaller" because the punch letters are tapered. Another possible factor is die polishing during the life of the die, which would have a similar effect.
     
    Johndoe2000$ likes this.
  6. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    You also can go to Varietyvista.com as this site has mint mark styles used during different periods .
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page