Play the authenticator ...Trade Dollar

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by ddddd, Jun 6, 2017.

  1. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    Here we have a trade dollar. Pretend you are the authenticator. Is it real, a recent fake, an old counterfeit, etc. What about it looks right or wrong?

    I'll share my thoughts after we have some others chime in. Thank you!

    IMG_1237.JPG
    IMG_1238.JPG
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. KSorbo

    KSorbo Well-Known Member

    The design looks right to me but the surface roughness makes me wonder. With so much wear it's hard to tell if it's environmental damage or from casting.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  4. Dougmeister

    Dougmeister Well-Known Member

    Is that an "S" mintmark on the reverse? If so, it looks to be in the wrong position...?
     
    ddddd likes this.
  5. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    No mintmark that I can see; likely a hit/mark?
     
  6. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Looks cast to me
     
    ddddd and Insider like this.
  7. Volante

    Volante Well-Known Member

    I would say cast as well - the details look very mushy.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  8. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    The gross details of the design are correct for 1877 but too many discrepancies between the coin, and what the coin should look like at this state of wear, exist for me to even consider authenticity. Chances are slim and none, and Slim left town. :)
     
    ddddd and Dougmeister like this.
  9. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Fake
     
    ddddd and Insider like this.
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Suspicious looking, though I lack the knowledge necessary to outright condemn it.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  11. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Fake
     
    ddddd likes this.
  12. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    very mushy, the letters look bloated and malformed. I think it is a cast copy.
     
    ddddd and Insider like this.
  13. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    fake, fairly recent copy
     
    ddddd likes this.
  14. Rassi

    Rassi #GoCubs #FlyTheW #WeAreGood

    Too mushy - I agree with the "cast" camp.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  15. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Looks exactly like cast coins I have handled.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  16. Dave Waterstraat

    Dave Waterstraat Well-Known Member

    Everything appears to be positioned where it should be and even the denticles don't look that bad as compared to cast counterfeits, but If this thing is real it shouldn't be. It's that fugly.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  17. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Treashunt, posted: "Fake, fairly recent copy"

    Curious, what do you base this on?
     
    ddddd likes this.
  18. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    I would also be interested in knowing how one can tell if it's a recent copy @Treashunt

    By the way, I'm fairly certain it is counterfeit.
    It does look like the surface is a bit mushy/grainy. Also, the weight being 20 grams makes me think it is well outside normal tolerance levels.
    Otherwise nothing about the details sticks out immediately.
     
  19. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    @ddddd

    It looks like the member has been viewing other threads. Anyway, to answer my question :smuggrin: THIS IS NOT A RECENT COPY! AFAIK, crude lead fakes like this were not even around in the 1960's. These things are not even included in basic authentications seminars. What to look for:

    1. Guarantee the weight is way off.
    2. The thickness and diameter is probably off also.
    3. If rubbed on a sheet of white paper, it probably leaves a gray line.

    None of these help us with a photo so:

    1. The color is lead gray not silver and toned silver (unless it is covered in carbon corrosion) is never this color.
    2. As most have said, the letters are not sharp and raised from the field. They are flat, mushy, and partially filled ("A's").

    So color and sharpness alone should make you doubt its authenticity. :D

    :eggface::facepalm::oops: Just noticed you are the OP. Yes. Twenty grams is WAY, WAY off.

    PS These things are still collectable. I should guess a value between $5 & $10 only because it is not deceptive. My guess is early 20th century casting.
     
    ddddd and dwhiz like this.
  20. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

  21. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank


    or FOX news
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page