Photo vs Scan

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Billyray, May 22, 2010.

  1. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Howdy yall.

    I need to know what's better, my photos or a a scan. I know photos are better than scans, but the only camera I have available ATM sucks. I also have access to a scanner so I was wondering if it's quality would be better.

    Here is a few of the pics, that I can take with my current camera, which i had to shrink 75% to make them smaller. Would a scanner do a better job?

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    The first and last were taken outside in natural light, the Ike was taken indoors with a single close light source and normal ambient lighting(overhead, window etc.)
     
  4. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    IMO the Ike looks best and sharpest.

    Does your camera have a Macro button/function for closeups? Its symbol looks like a Tulip most times.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    yup, those were taken on macro setting, but I still had to be about a foot away to get them to focus. It's a cheap camera lol
     
  6. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Like most things in life, there are tradeoffs between scans and photos...

    Scans are easy. They show a coin's surfaces very well.

    Photos are harder. They show a coin's surfaces AND luster very well.
     
  7. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    p.s. that shot of the Ike is very good. Try adding another light and moving the lights to 2 and 10 o'clock on the coin and they will be even better! :)
     
  8. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Will that help things like the major ding on his eyebrow show up?
     
  9. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    I too like the Ike picture the best.
     
  10. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    Billy - Have you given any thought to using a copy stand for your photos? It may help and make photographing easier, since you say your camera is of the "inexpensive" type. Lots of them on ebay for about $60... I got mine on Amazon... With the stand, the height of your camera can be adjusted so as to increase its distance from the specimen being photographed...

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Yup, thinking of buying one of those to get the best out of what I have before I get a better camera, $60 is alot easier to come up with than $500, although I could spend that $60 on coins lol.
     
  12. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    After I got mine, it made photographing coins so much more easier. Before, mine looked like crap, and I could never get settings right nor consistent, because every shot was invariably positioned differently towards a coin.
     
  13. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Do you use any type of "positioner" for the coins?
     
  14. thaivic

    thaivic Junior Member

    In most cases I, personally, prefer to scan. It's quicker and there's no setting everything up (camera, camera stand, lights). The fact that I'm also a lousy photographer also has some bearing.

    I'll scan coins at 200ppi but if I require finer detail then it's 1200ppi and then crop for the area wanted to reduce the file size. Okay you miss out on lustre etc. but then I'm not trying to impress anyone for a sale.

    At the end of the day it's a personal thing like coin storage (album, holder, flip, bag, biscuit tin).

    Vic
     
  15. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    I have a very dark black piece of cardboard that I place the coins on. I then adjust/move the cardboard while it sits on the copy-stand's stage, rather than the coin, while looking through the camera's viewfinder. And when I'm satisfied with the positioning of the coin, I set the camera's timer for a 2 second delay/countdown, and click the shutter-button. The 2 second delay allows for any vibrations caused by me pressing the camera's shutter-button to settle.
     
  16. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Tarnations! those are for biscuits!

    but seriously, I'm gonna try scanning and see if it's acceptable. But since I am gonna be selling (eventually), I may just go for the photos if the scan quality isn't good enough. I'll be scanning hires then resizing though.
     
  17. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    Yeah, I've discovered the 2 second delay helps a ton lol.
     
  18. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    Wow, that sounds tedious! My camera stand just sits on my worktable. It's small enough where it can stay there alongside my stereo microscope, scale, etc. All it takes is 5 seconds to screw the camera into the stand (if it isn't already), and it's ready to go. The stand never needs adjusting, as I've got it positioned in a manner where all coins can be optimally photographed. I just use the camera's macro setting, focus, timer, and voila! 20 seconds and I've got Obverse and Reverse shots done.

    It takes longer to sneaker-net the camera card from the camera over to the laptop's built-in SIM reader.
     
  19. Billyray

    Billyray Junior Member

    CC, what kind of camera do you use?
     
  20. CheetahCats

    CheetahCats Colonial & Early American

    I have two, a Sony Cybershot DSC-HX1 and a Fuji A820.

    The Sony is a superb SLR. However, I use the Fuji A820. It's resolution suffices for this purpose. The Sony is too big and more tedious to use.

    Though it's a cheaper model and not an SLR, the Fuji is quicker to set-up, has a smaller footprint, and the camera-chip is faster to extract. It's also faster to batch-through a bunch of shots when there are multiple coins to photograph.
     
  21. Duke Kavanaugh

    Duke Kavanaugh The Big Coin Hunter

    Do you use your camera on your stereoscope?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page