PCGS Slab Error - "1892" (1893) Columbian Expo US Half Dollar

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by iPen, May 12, 2016.

  1. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    I purchased an "1892" Columbian Expo half dollar that was slabbed in error by PCGS. It's really an 1893, as you can tell from the photo of the coin. I checked to make sure that there were no cracks in the slab and there are none. The PCGS certification number comes up as an 1892 in the system.

    I'm not too concerned of any fakes or a coin switch, as the grade appears to be correct. There's original cartwheel luster, amazing toning, etc. What I am wondering though is if the graders missed some other details. Though, someone else other than the graders was probably in charge of the data entry.

    I see on the obverse to the left of the bust what appears to be a struck through error. I took a photo of it (shown below) but it may be difficult to make it out from the image I took, but it's really easy to tell in-person. Otherwise, I'm surprised that such a deep and long 1/2 cm gash/scratch would grade. Any thoughts on that?

    Thanks in advance!

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2016
    tommyc03, TJ1952 and dwhiz like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. johnmatt

    johnmatt Well-Known Member

    My faith in pcgs gets lower every day
     
  4. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Cases like these are almost always just a error by the slabbing department. They basically just selected the wrong year for that one when they printed the label.
     
    iPen and Paul M. like this.
  5. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Here's a better picture of the scratch (also added to first post) - should this be an MS-62 grade if it's a 5mm scratch on the non-relief field?

    Or, is it a struck-through error?


    [​IMG]
     
  6. jtlee321

    jtlee321 Well-Known Member

    Funny, I had that exact coin in my watch list. I almost pulled the trigger on it. Glad a board member snagged it.
     
    iPen likes this.
  7. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    IMO, that is not a scratch, it is a "hit". Your coin is an AU-58 (these are now graded as MS-62's). Therefore, the hit is insignificant. Without the friction all over the face and fewer tiny marks and the dirt, IMO the coin would have graded at least MS-63 (and has a shot at 64 due to the attractive color.)
     
  8. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Beautiful coin! Fun mistake. Nice pickup :)
     
  9. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Doubt 'struck through'.......Lovely coin though. I've a soft spot for Columbians......especially naked ones........ devil.gif
     
  10. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    You have good taste ;)
     
  11. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    It looks as if a screw got pressed down onto it during the striking process. If it's a hit, it looks like a screw/spiral object hit it, or something else hit it in a series of in-line hits.

    If it isn't a struck through error during the strike, could it be a planchet defect?
     
  12. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Not sure if you would want to or not. But I imagine they would take it back a re-slab it at no fee.
     
  13. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Looks like a hit to me but it's still a nice looking coin.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page