PCGS mistake? 1796 large cent attribution

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by ccrook, Apr 5, 2016.

  1. ccrook

    ccrook New Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jdiablo30

    Jdiablo30 Well-Known Member

    If you got this graded at the Baltimore show. You aren't the only one that pcgs messed up on. I had one dealer tell me they marked a $5 Indian as a nickel on a brand new holder and were giving the dealer a hard time about fixing it. Can't comment on your coin though. Not familiar with the series
     
    BigTee44, Paul M. and ccrook like this.
  4. ccrook

    ccrook New Member

    Yep. That's completely absurd.

    Not to mention they said they would text when the coins were ready for pickup. Luckily I happened to be around Saturday when they were packing up and headed over to check on my order just in case. They never texted and said they weren't able to do that, so I almost missed picking up my coins due to their failure.

    Color me unimpressed. Thinking that's both my first and last show grading experience.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  5. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Mistakes happen. Give them a call. They will fix it.
     
  6. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Wait for conder or marshall - to me it looks like it very well could be an NC-4.
     
  7. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    PCGS isn't wrong; they didn't offer a Sheldon variety for your coin at all. It's the single leaf reverse of 1795, all right. Did you pay for attribution?
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  8. ccrook

    ccrook New Member

    I did indeed pay for attribution.
     
  9. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    It's not possible to see the slab at their Cert Verification site - did they offer a Sheldon number at all? I may have misread your post. Coinfacts lists them only by reverse, not by Sheldon.
     
  10. ccrook

    ccrook New Member

  11. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Yeah, they beat you pretty badly about the head on that one, then.

    Says a lot about them, if they can't keep QC straight at a show.
     
  12. ccrook

    ccrook New Member

    Just spoke with customer service.

    Apparently they don't do variety attribution at shows, yet their folks at their table neglected to mention that entirely, while watching me fill out the order form. It only appears here rather than on their order form. So looks like I'm sending in a for a reholder....
     
  13. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    So they weren't capable of reading the order form you filled out properly while you were standing in front of them, nor realizing you were paying for a service they didn't offer at a show. What, exactly, did they look at while taking your form and your money (the total of which obviously would have been more than they charged for the service they did offer)? Did they at least not charge you for attribution?

    Not a good look, PCGS. Everything you sell is essentially a custom order, and you apparently don't know how to read an order.
     
    NSP and Amos 811 like this.
  14. beef1020

    beef1020 Junior Member

    That sounds frustrating to think you are getting it attributed and then to get it back without. For what it's worth, I don't really trust PCGS to attribute early copper anyway, I have had too many mis-attributed and they do not guarantee their attribution. So if you pay a premium for a rare variety based on their attribution, they will not stand behind it.

    Additionally, to maximize the value of this coin, if and when you sell it, it's gonna go to someone who specializes in early copper, and they will either be able to attribute it themselves and be comfortable, or they will ask a dealer who they trust. The PCGS attribution will not make a difference.

    It looks like an NC4 to me, obverse 11 based on the date position and the T position related to the forehead, reverse Q based on the triple leafs left of ONE and CENT. Nice coin. Did you cherry pick this or buy it attributed?
     
  15. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    It is most definitely NC-4 and nice enough to be a condition census piece.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page