65 and 66. Like both and I feel generous tonight. If I am one point too high on each I'm ok with that.
Very nice. Il say 64,..65, though they could go higher very easily. Not that the TPGS would ever treat this mint mark any differently,... right???
I think the bias manifests more clearly in lower-grade rarities than at the top end with Conditional Rarities, where the TPG's seem hesitant to dilute existing Registry member holdings as those people are cash cows for them, prompting large-scale crackout/regrades. Both of them could be high-end 65's or low-end 66's, with the 1880 having the better argument for the higher grade. The 1878 is VAM-9, the 1880 VAM-3 I think.