Nickel Jefferson FS is challenge to find...

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Aslpride, Apr 19, 2012.

  1. Aslpride

    Aslpride Active Member

    I was able to fully understand full step by yesterday and I was checking my mint sets. It was hard to find it as I did found five steps from 1967 SMS, but in the middle was damaged by Jefferson's head. I checked the website and it confirmed that it must be full steps from side to side. Here's picture of my 1967 SMS...

    [​IMG]

    Let me know if it's correct that it has to be full steps from side to side that this coin doesn't qualify as FS?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dsmith23

    dsmith23 Gotta get 'em all

    I would not say that is FS the nick down the middle counts against it.
     
  4. Merc Crazy

    Merc Crazy Bumbling numismatic fool

    That's nowhere near. You need at least 5 full steps.

    Read this thread by the preeminent expert on Jeffys (At least imho) on this site...

    http://www.cointalk.com/t49827/
     
  5. Aslpride

    Aslpride Active Member

    Found 1972-D 6 steps, but five steps from side to side.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. camlov2

    camlov2 Member

    I would say that the major nick/scratch to the right would disqualify it as FS
     
  7. Merc Crazy

    Merc Crazy Bumbling numismatic fool

    Borderline... Probably would't cut it on a later-date issue like that.
     
  8. Aslpride

    Aslpride Active Member

    That's all I found in my mint sets...

    1987-P
    [​IMG]
    1987-D
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Merc Crazy

    Merc Crazy Bumbling numismatic fool


    Top one I'd say has a 95% chance.

    Bottom one, nope.

    By the way, you can find great-looking '87's in bank rolls... I've probably got half a dozen or so 6FS gems from rolls... for some reason, most Jeffys from that year were struck great.
     
  10. Merc Crazy

    Merc Crazy Bumbling numismatic fool

    Double post, sorry...
     
  11. Aslpride

    Aslpride Active Member

    Hello everyone, thank you for your feedback. :)

    merc: Thank you for letting me know about roll. Won't it damage steps by clashing with other coins in roll?
     
  12. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Full Steps are nice but I personally don't go crazy over a Jefferson just because it has full steps or condemn the coin because it doesn't. I will tell you that for date/mm that are commonly found with full steps, I strive to have a full step example represent my collection. My criteria for common is greater than 10% of the total population exhibiting full steps. Now for your coins:

    1967 SMS: No full steps, large nick between 2nd & 3rd pillar, 6-0-3-5 by quarterstep method.
    1972-D: 5FS, 6-5-5-5
    1987-P: 5FS, 6-5-5-6
    1987-D: 6FS, The mark in the first quarter between the 2nd & 3rd step might knock it down to 5FS

    btw, here is a dynamite 6FS for your enjoyment: Population 5/0

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Amazing strike for an LDS coin.
     
  13. Aslpride

    Aslpride Active Member

    lehigh96: Thank you for clarify on number of steps and add the example. I will keep my eyes on those FS in future search. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page