Will "awesome finger print" coins replace "monster toning" coins as the new fad? Why or why not? https://www.ebay.com/itm/154275890843?hash=item23eb8f469b:g:bAgAAOSwylpf8pAl
Let’s hope not. I find a fingerprint very disturbing. It makes the coin look ugly and unattractive. Toning does not have that affect.
I am with @Collecting Nut. Most fingerprints are ugly and distracting. So far as I'm concerned, that 2020 cent is overpriced by $19.99.
I'm sure there is a collector for uit out there somewhere, I don't know about $20, but I'm sure someone will see it and think, "they that's cool, I'd buy that for $1.00 if the shipping is free!"
Now that I think about it, most people like the toning but consider it damage. Wouldn’t fingerprints be a form of damage? They would to me.
Agree with your position in general but don't know about toning...might depend on the amount of toning and/or collector's likes, etc. For instance, some toning DOES have that effect for me...I hate too much toning, the "monster" and heavy psychedelic varieties are indeed ugly and unattractive to me, etc. A little and gentle toning is nice...some gold/amber near rims or champagne and even a bit of rainbow...but not too much, too heavy, etc. To each their own.
If artificially toned coins are a plague, partly because many of us cannot detect them, then a finger-printed coin is nothing more than a sniffle. Because artificially fingerprinting a coin is the easiest thing in the world to accomplish and detect- heck some of us do it without even meaning to.
Depends on whose fingerprint it is. If it is someone famous it would be similar to collecting autographs.
HA, I can see it now. A cottage industry of selling hacked FBI fingerprint databases for tracking down unsuspecting (in?)famous coin holders.
Maybe infectious. Intentional to make the grooves that thin ( very light touch) . Most people hold a coin with more pressure which would widen and blur the whorls. IMO, Jim