New National Park=Lengthening the National Park Quarter Series?

So I hear there's a new national park. Since it was made before the last national park quarter was created, will they be making an addition to the list of quarters to come?
http://travel.yahoo.com/ideas/pinnacles-national-park--what-makes-it-stand-out-202205177.html

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Nope, it's one park or site quarter per state/territory, not one quarter per park or site - the parks/sites have already been picked.

 

But in year nine of the program the Sec of the Treasury has the option to order a second 11 year round of parks. If he does then the new one could be chosen for round two.

 

Not sure how that would work, as there's only one park/site allowed per state/territory and CA has already been done. We'd have to add another state/territory and choose a park/site in that state/territory or change the park/site already selected for a state/territory that hasn't been done. Or are you saying the Sec could start the series over for another 11 years with a new park/site for each state/territory? I think that would be called beating a dead horse, but who knows.

 

Yes that is what the law permits, the Sec can order a second round, each state gets to pick another park/site and we do ATB II.

 

I would surprised if we did not have a second series of ATB quarters and 5 oz "pucks."

 

I wouldn't mind, these AtB's are one of my favorites.

 

I have to agree. Idk why, but I love the ring around the reverse. Makes the design stand out to me.

 

LOL, did you see my other posts about this? Although I like 90% of the designs, I don't like the ring, as it forces the design to be the size of a cent. But, I'm sure it's easier for the mint to have a format for all. Of course the 5 ounce P's are unbelievable, no drawback to the size of the design.

 

Haha, nope! Haven't seen it! I see why some people wouldn't enjoy the design. For some odd reason I enjoy how the ring condenses the design, making the designs have much more minute detail. But to each their own.