Need help with figuring out Overton numbers on Capped Bust Half's

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by heyatrain, Dec 3, 2010.

  1. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Hello everyone,

    Where could I find something on the internet on overton numbers to match the toning on my coins. Here is one of the coin. Thanks for the help!!
    Aaron
    IMG_0007SMALL.jpg IMG_0008SMALL.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    From a real quick check it looks like O-111
     
  4. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Where would I go to check myself?
     
  5. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Well you could buy the books, or you might be able to check out online a few very extensive collections that have sold at auction. You might try the Reiver collection that was sold by Heritage or the Russel Logan collection. I don't remember who sold Logans set. Those sets have many or most of the varieties but not all of them. If you don't want to buy the book you might try borrowing it through an interlibrary loan.

    I don't remember which forum it's on but one of them has a series of threads that show pictures of most of the varieties. I think it may be on the NGC forum.
     
  6. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Ok, Thanks! What do you think about this one? I look at the Reiver Collection on Heritage website and it look O-105. Take a look.
    IMG_0005small.jpg IMG_0006small.jpg
     
  7. vnickels

    vnickels Matt Draiss Numismatics & Galleries

    man heyatrain nice coin pic posted!
     
  8. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Thanks! Any Idea on the Overton Number?
     
  9. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Here another one............
    IMG_0007small.jpg IMG_0008small.jpg
     
  10. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

  11. texmech

    texmech Wanna be coin collector

    sweet, heyatrain :)
     
  12. mpcusa

    mpcusa "Official C.T. TROLL SWEEPER"

    Excellent coins :)
     
  13. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm thinking O-113a. Nice coin.
     
  14. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Thanks Guys!! Idhair, Thanks for the help & link. I will check it out.
     
  15. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Here's another one for your guy's opinions...
    CBHD-11 OBV small.jpg CBHD-11 REV small.jpg
     
  16. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    You can also try coinzip also. The key is knowing what to match up - like the I in pluribus to the T in states. They have very good bust halves section.
     
  17. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    On the 1827 I agree with Idhair O-113a. I believe the 1828 is O-117. I'm having problems with the 1819 though. I can't get it to match up to anything. It should be easy because it has some very distinctive features. The obv appears to be an 1819/8. There are five overdate obv listedfor this year. Three of them have block 8's and two have fancy 8's (and these two dies are the ONLY fancy 8 dies for this year.). Yours is a fancy 8. That should make it obv 1 or obv 3. On obv 1 star 7 points at the upper half of the curl by the headband. On obv 3 it points ot the junction of the two curls by the head band. Yours seems to point at the front of the lower curl like Obv 2. But obv 2 has a block 8.

    Then there is the rev. Your coin has a tall slender 5 in 50. There are only three reverse with that style of 5, rev A, B, & C. On rev A & B the 5 leans heavily right like on your coin, and on C it is upright. On A the I in PLURIBUS is almost centered under the T. That doesn't match yours at all. That just leaves B. On B the I is below the right serif of the A. Yours isn't that far left. On yours it is under the left serif of the T. (As seen on Rev C! But on rev C the tip of the arrow feathers is over the upright of the 5. On yours it is definitely left of the upright.) So your rev most closely matches B, but B does not come paired with a fancy 8 obv.

    Can anyone else confirm my observations?
     
  18. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I gave up on the 1819. Can't figure it out.
     
  19. heyatrain

    heyatrain New Member

    Thanks for your help Idhair & conder101. I really appriciate it!
     
  20. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Well two of us have now failed on the 1819 and I believe both of us are fairly experienced at variety attributions. This makes this a very interesting piece. They do discover new varieties from time to time.

    Idhair, I'm using the third edition of Overton (1990) to try and attribute it. What are you using? I ask just in case there is an error in the book. And are you seeing the same things I am?
     
  21. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page