My first Redfield Morgan :)... GTG

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Cascade, Mar 18, 2016.

  1. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Let's play GTG with these pics then again with my pics when it arrives today or Monday...

    340742-1.jpg 340742-2.jpg
     
    TopcatCoin and longnine009 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. longarm

    longarm Well-Known Member

  4. messydesk

    messydesk Well-Known Member

    Pretty decent looking coin. 63-64, I guess.
     
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    I'll start with 63-64. Any plans to get PCGS or NGC to weigh in on a grade?
     
  6. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    I'm seeing a 63+ very possibly 64
     
  7. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    Redfield graded Morgans are notoriously over graded by 1, mostly 2 points.

    Nice looking 63
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  8. NSP

    NSP Well-Known Member

    I'll go MS64. Nice coin!
     
  9. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Just trivia but I thought it was interesting....Conder101 states in an old thread that when Paramount was selling these, standards for MS grades had not been established. The first edition ANA book was still several years out. So yes these often are overgraded by todays standards but one cannot fairly charge the company with overgrading at the time.
     
    Paul M. and Stevearino like this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I'm seeing a great looking 63 but it was graded 2 grades above by a marketing grading services just because it's a Redfield. We're selling the name, not the coin.
     
  11. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    LaVere rocks!

    [​IMG]
     
    Cascade likes this.
  12. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    I dunno maybe. Most 81s Redfields I've seen are extreemly baggy for some reason. Maybe from the laundry shoot express, I don't know. But this one was relatively clean especially on the obverse plus it has a little color. I have it at 64 due to the reverse bagmarks I just hope the pics aren't hiding anything more than minor luster breaks on the cheek.

    And yes guys, these Paramount grades are meaningless really.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2016
    JPeace$ likes this.
  13. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    :wideyed:... I haven't read that yet!
     
  14. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    It's a good book. LaVere was quite a money man. And he did it starting with nothing during the Great Depression.
     
  15. It's on the cusp of 63/64, but I would lean 64. Nice pick up! TC
     
    Cascade likes this.
  16. Stevearino

    Stevearino Well-Known Member

    The obverse is pretty nice and the reverse, at least from these pics, isn't all as baggy as you indicate. I'm going to step out on the grading limb and go 65. "Shoot if you must, this old gray head..."

    Steve
     
  17. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    That's pretty much what I was thinking when I pulled the trigger. From these pics I doubted a 63 and thought 65 might not be out of the question. Just being conservative until I have it in hand
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  18. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Is it yours? I'd be interested in borrowing it. And yes, he made his money in cheap depression era real estate from my understanding. He would drive a beat up pickup truck with banded $10K bricks of cash he'd carry around in a paper bag. I have a big family connection to the tahoe reno area which is why I've always liked his story and I chose 81s as my first because it's my centennial birthyear and home state mint
    .. why couldn't I have been born in Nevada in 1989 or cali in 1993 lol
     
  19. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    Pictures can be "touched up" - just a little. :)

    [​IMG]
     
    Stevearino likes this.
  20. Cascade

    Cascade CAC Grader, Founding Member

    Not with GC. They use professional techniques is all which accentuates the beauty but can hide minor imperfections
     
  21. Markus1959

    Markus1959 Well-Known Member

    Well it does look extremely nice, just have to see what the bag marks look like in hand.
     
    Cascade likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page