My first PCGS Guarantee Resubmission

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by C-B-D, Sep 22, 2017.

  1. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I've never had this happen before, but it's a BIG mistake on their part. This coin was purchased by a friend of mine raw and we split it. It was advertised as the FS-104 and it fooled us, too. The FS-104 is the really rare one and I had it graded and attributed by PCGS early this year. PCGS price guide lists this coin at $4500, which is a major stretch. The pop for this coin is 3, and it's tied for the finest known RB (even though there are 2 MS66 RD's). A potential buyer emailed me a couple days ago and pointed out that this is actually die pair #7, easily identified by the die dot between Lincoln's lips. So this coin is worth about $100 instead of thousands. I just mailed it back to PCGS today. It IS covered by their guarantee, but they determine replacement cost and the payout amount for the mistake.

    I know of a guy that this happened to: He bought a MS63RB FS-104 at Stacks & Bowers for $881 (a steal) and PCGS fought with him over the payout amount for months. I'm not sure what was resolved, if anything, but I do know they just wanted to pay him $881, even though they historically sold for $1250, before his sold so low at Stacks. He may have just gotten his money back and broken even.

    I won't say on here what I paid, but it was a lot, and it was purchased raw. Enough time has passed that the eBay sales record of it is gone, and there is NO record of a past MS64 RB being sold, so I suspect that PCGS will have a difficult time assigning a payout amount. The only sale on eBay is a AU55BN that sold for $887.

    Here's the coin. This whole process could take a couple of months or more, but I will try to keep this thread updated.
    s-l1600.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2017
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    I'm a tad confused. What damage to you has PCGS caused?
     
    TypeCoin971793 and Seattlite86 like this.
  4. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    When the incident with the infamous 1st PF70 Lincoln occurred, when PCGS stepped in and stopped the auction in process, the current bid for the coin (and it was during a live auction) was something like $56,000 if memory serves. But PCGS stopped it, pulled the coin and downgraded it, and paid the actual owner something like $32,000 - over 20,000 less that what the coin would have brought if they had allowed the sale to continue.

    What I'm getting at is PCGS does not determine value based on actual sale prices of coins. When they honor their guarantee the pay out amount is pretty much always far less that recent realized prices. They claim that their payout is based on what a dealer can buy the coin for as being the actual value.

    An idea I've expressed before and been scoffed at for doing so.
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  5. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Emotional. LOL!
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2017
    Kirkuleez, Seattlite86 and Insider like this.
  6. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Tell your dog I said hi!

    LOL
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Wishing you the best!

    Chris
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  8. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    It happens, no ones perfect ....................
     
  9. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    8 different die pairs, and so many subtle differences in several of them.
     
  10. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    If I were Pcgs I would let the Variety experts handle the coin first, get their seal of approval and not be responsible for these kinds of issues .

    Lee ( 19yrs ) has pointed some mistakes Pcgs made on Ike Dollars too .
     
    C-B-D likes this.
  11. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    Don't you find it humorous how such small differences mean the difference of throusands of dollars?
     
    coinsareus10, harrync and C-B-D like this.
  12. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    True. If I were going to actually OWN one for my collection, it would be the one with the boldest doubling, not this one.
     
  13. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Since you are the original submitter they owe you a reholdering, correction of the label, and possibly a refund of the attribution fee if any. If you had BOUGHT it already slabbed and misattributed, then they would owe you compensation based on the value of the variety.
     
  14. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    C-B-D, posted: 8 different die pairs, and so many subtle differences in several of them."

    You may wish to check on this statement. AFAIK :angelic:, there may be a few more.
     
  15. Blissskr

    Blissskr Well-Known Member

    Are they really going to pay anything or just call it a 'mechanical error' and re slab + attribute it at no cost? My guess is they won't pay out anything and will simply do as @Conder101 stated. pcgs.png
     
  16. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    Conder, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't NGC refuse to warranty (guarantee) varieties since attribution can be so "sketchy"?

    Chris
     
  17. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Yes, as written (last time I looked) the NGC guarantee does not cover attributions. If they get an attribution wrong their only obligation is to reholder and correct the label, no compensation even if you bought it based on their attribution.
     
  18. SorenCoins

    SorenCoins Well-Known Member

    Huh interesting.The PCGS Guarantee confuses me can anyone explain it easier?
     
  19. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    The cliff notes version is basically that if you were the submitter they re-holder it correctly for free so that you don't get a windfall off the mistake. If you had bought it on the aftermarket they will work with you to try and come to an agreeable solution whether that be buying it back from you, finding a replacement, re-holdering it properly and giving some money back ect.
     
    Cascade and SorenCoins like this.
  20. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Most likely just re-slab it at no cost since it sounds like he submitted it
     
  21. Seattlite86

    Seattlite86 Outspoken Member

    Doesn't sound to me like PCGS owes anything but a re label.
     
    coinsareus10 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page