My First Constantine II Bronze. Some help on the altar type, please.

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Marsyas Mike, Mar 5, 2017.

  1. Marsyas Mike

    Marsyas Mike Well-Known Member

    Recently got this Constantine II bronze (I think) - it was part of a lot, and in hand it was much better looking than I thought it would be. Some roughness and what might be called cabinet friction on the highlights, but pretty, I think. Never been a LRB collector, but I think I'm smitten.

    Anyway, I was wondering if anybody could help me with attribution. I think I am in the ballpark with RIC Lyons 76 or 77 based on Wildwinds, but I can't tell the difference. The RIC list of variations confuses me too, but just have the spreadsheet version. The altar on my example baffles me - is that a "V" inside of it, or just the back set of legs in a 3D perspective? Or something else?

    Not trying to get other people to do my homework....okay, well, yes I am. I guess if anybody could steer me in the right direction, I'd be much obliged.

    Constantine II follis Lyons (2).JPG

    Constantine II follis Lyons (7).JPG
    Constantine II, AE follis of Lyons. 17mm AD 320.
    DN CONSTANTINO IVN NOB C, laureate, draped and cuirassed bust right / VICTORIAE LAET PRINC PERP, two Victories standing facing each other, holding between them a shield inscribed VOT PR on an altar decorated (with a V?) Mintmark: two captives back to back. RIC VIILyons 76 or 77 ?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    Using Dane's spreadsheets, I make it as

    Constantine II
    DN CONSTANTINO IVN NOB C
    LDC
    VICTORIAE LAET PRINC PERP VOT PR
    4b
    plain 2 captives back to back
    Lyons RIC VII Lyons 77
    R5
     
    Alegandron and gregarious like this.
  4. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    The design on the altar has nothing to do with the RIC number. In fact, RIC simply says "altar of varying design":

    Capture reverse description JPG.JPG

    What distinguishes RIC Lyon 76 from 77 is the bust type. Here's the listing from RIC:

    Capture.JPG

    76 has bust type B3, whereas 77 has bust type B4. Looking at the table of bust types ....

    Capture bust types.JPG

    We see that the difference between the two types is that B3 is seen from the back and B4 is seen from the front.

    Yours is seen from the front, and is therefore type B4. Therefore, your coin is RIC 77.
     
  5. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    And it IS a very nice example of the type -- well-centered, nicely-patinated, and with fully-legible inscriptions.
     
    gregarious likes this.
  6. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer


    this coin has a seen from the back bust type
     
  7. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    I respectfully disagree; you're looking at the front of his chest here.
     
  8. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    no, this coin is most definitely seen from back. If you are confused you can even look at the plate coin.

    The term "seen from the back" is not literal, meaning you are not actually seeing the back.

    I have also attached the examples from Wildwinds

    note the differences between the first coin which is B4 and the second which is B3.

    there are several ways to differentiate the busts, pay particular attention to the right shoulder (left as you are looking). There are several more diagnostic points, but I am not going to list them all here, it should be sufficient to just look at the two different bust types and notice the diferences. I have also attached a seen from back bust with some highlighted areas to note

    Also in this case, seen from back types are much more common.

    _lyons_RIC_VII_077var.jpg

    _lyons_RIC_VII_076v.jpg

    a2.jpg
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2017
    Mikey Zee, Ajax, Johndakerftw and 3 others like this.
  9. Marsyas Mike

    Marsyas Mike Well-Known Member

    This has been very, very helpful. That "seen from back" description was confusing me too (though I forgot to mention it). I really appreciate the assistance.
     
  10. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    It can be a tough one if you have not seen many examples, but there are actually more confusing bust types in RIC VII.

    Years ago I made some pages to illustrate the bust types in RIC VII

    http://www.constantinethegreatcoins.com/busts/
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2017
    Roman Collector likes this.
  11. Mikey Zee

    Mikey Zee Delenda Est Carthago

    It never ceases to amaze me how many 'variants' I am not even aware of:confused::bookworm: LOL
     
  12. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    I stand corrected and have been miscategorizing my LRBs for a long time. What the catalog means to say is "seen mostly from the front" and "seen from the front but less so."
     
    Mikey Zee likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page