My analysis of the PCGS 3000 Index

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by CoinBlazer, Oct 4, 2018.

  1. CoinBlazer

    CoinBlazer Numismatic Enthusiast

    The PCGS 3000 is a price index evaluating the value and economy of the rare coin industry,
    Here is the most recent data

    Screenshot 2018-10-04 at 11.45.46 AM.png

    I also find this disclaimer interesting

    Disclaimer: The PCGS3000® reflects the opinions of PCGS’s coin price experts with respect to indexes developed by PCGS for specific coin categories. Particular coins being offered for sale may not have been included within particular indexes, and if included, may not have experienced the same market movements as the index as a whole. Therefore, the PCGS3000® should only be used as one guide to rare coin prices and historical price movements, and not as the sole source for determining the value or market history of a particular coin. Collectors Universe, Inc. disclaims any warranties whatsoever with respect to the accuracy of the PCGS3000® or any specific coin index.

    What I find interesting about this disclaimer is that it in no way does it explain how these values are created. We can obviously assume that coin values are for PCGS Certified and since NGC beat PCGS to the 40 million graded coins mark it does not show the full spectrum.

    Another point is the so what factor, I don't wake up and say, oh boy the PCGS index is up 0.82%! There are very few examples of how this is of any use to anyone.

    Key Dates and Rarities?
    Screenshot 2018-10-04 at 11.51.25 AM.png
    The index claims that the Key Dates and Rarities Index is worth $25,000. How is that number is formulated? And how do they decide what is classified as a rarity or key date?
    If they do have a "it is a rarity if it is worth more that 1 million" classification of rarities, that would fall because coin values are volatile and one day the coin may be classified as a rarity this way and the next day it isn't. And what if at one auction, the coin breaks the million dollar mark and the next auction the same day it doesn't?


    In short
    The PCGS 3000 index is arbitrary and its uses are significantly limited.
     
    GoldFinger1969 and Vess1 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    It's really completely worthless in all honesty. Classic commemoratives are a huge chunk of it, proofs and MS are mixed together, the grade choices for some dates are very curious ect. They could make it something interesting on smaller individualized scales with some work put into it, but as it stands now its a big nothing burger not even worth checking.

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/pcgs3000.aspx

    That's the list of what is actually in it which most people aren't aware of.
     
    SorenCoins likes this.
  4. SilverDollar2017

    SilverDollar2017 Morgan dollars

    I agree with baseball, it's not worth using IMO.
     
  5. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    It’s not of much value to collectors and dealers because they are interested in specific series or are buying one or a limited number of coins that are considered one at a time. In addition, most collectors aren’t in it for long term capital gain (good luck to those that are!). Most dealers want to turn-over inventory quickly, so long term trends aren’t of much value. It probably is of value to tangible investment advisors for comparison of performance with other classes of assets like art, wines, precious metals, gems, etc.

    Cal
     
    baseball21 likes this.
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    The value of the 3000 Index, and the various other indexes that it is comprised of, is that it shows us the trend of the market, as well as specific portions of the market. That is the very reason it was created to begin with, and why the individual coins that make up the entire Index were chosen for inclusion in the Index !

    To claim that the 3000 Index has no value to collectors or dealers would be akin to saying that the DOW, the S&P 500, or any of the market indexes have no value to traders on Wall St. !

    The 3000 Index is immensely valuable to collectors and dealers ! But before it can have any value to you, you first have to know what it is, and then how to use it ! But if you don't, then yeah, you're right, it has no value at all.

    Let's say you're a coin dealer, it's the end of 2016, and you're trying to figure out what's likely to happen over the course of the next year. and you look at this chart -

    PCGS 3000c  2-25-17.gif

    What's that tell you that is likely to happen to the coin market in the coming year ? Realizing and understanding that the chart shows you the trend of the coin market as a whole. Can you honestly say that is of no value to you ? I sure couldn't !

    Now let's say that year is over and it is now the beginning of 2018, and you look at this chart -

    PCGS index 3  4-8-18.gif


    What's that tell you ? Well it tells me that my guess at what was likely to happen in 2017 was correct, and things don't really look any better for 2018.

    But now, it's the beginning of Oct. 2018, and as I always do I go check the charts to see the trend of the market shows me now. First i look at the 10 year -

    [​IMG]


    Ahhhh, maybe, at last things are beginning to turn around for the first time in 10 years ! Maybe, just maybe, the coin market has finally reached the bottom of its correction. So then I look at the 3 year to get a closer look.



    [​IMG]


    Yup, a noticeable increase. Significant ? Not really but at least it's a good sign. But I can plainly see from the 10 year chart that in 2014 the market tried to stabilize but then quickly fell off a cliff again and continued its downward trend. So let's not get to excited yet, but I know I need to keep an eye on things. After all, if I go back and look at the long term chart -

    [​IMG]


    And I blow it up so I can get closer look, I can see that the last time the market was this low was clear back in 2003, shortly after the bull market got started. And because I pay attention and follow these charts from time to time to understand the trends, I know that markets always try to find a bottom when they are in a correction. So maybe, just maybe, after 15 years of riding a yo-yo, things might be starting to get back to normal again.


    But wait a minute, what is and always has been the most popular segment of the coin market - silver dollars ! Yup, silver dollars. So let's take a look at those and let's see what's goin on.

    [​IMG]


    Well whaddya know, that graph almost mirrors the trend of the entire market. Let's see what the 3 year looks like -

    [​IMG]


    Yup, about the same. 'Course I already know if I look at the 1 year it's gonna show a more marked increase,


    [​IMG]


    But that can be somewhat misleading at times because it doesn't do as good a job of showing me the trends, it just shows short term movements in the market.

    But nahhhh, knowing stuff like that isn't of any value to anybody, least of all a coin dealer or a collector. :rolleyes:

    And yes, I am indeed trying to be sarcastic here - but only to make a point.
     
  7. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm going to add a quote here, a couple of them actually, both written by very wise men. The first, I'm reasonably certain that most will be familiar with it.

    "Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it."

    The second, far lesser known I imagine but yet perhaps even more profound.

    "The purpose of history is to explain the present - to say why the world around us is the way it is. History tells us what is important in our world, and how it came to be. It tells us why the things we value are the things we should value. And it tells us what is to be ignored, or discarded. That is true power - profound power. The power to define a whole society. The future, lies in the past."

    Edit - I decided to add one more quote, again, what I consider to be true words of wisdom.

    "There are many gifts that are unique in man; but at the center of them all, the root from which all knowledge grows, lies the ability to draw
    conclusions from what we see and what we do not see, to move our minds through space and time, and to recognize ourselves in the past on
    the steps to the present."
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2018
    Derek2200 and John Skelton like this.
  8. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    The main lesson from the history of coin prices is that they can go up and down unpredictably. The same randomness will occur whether or not one is aware that it happened in past.

    In the equity and bond markets, the SEC requires sellers of these investments to state specifically that past performance is not indicative of future results. The rule for mutual funds is SEC Rule 156. There are similar rules for sellers of other investment vehicles.

    Using past performance to predict future results is known as technical market analysis. There have been many books written on the topic. Most investment professionals consider it a fool’s errand, although some investment firms do employ a technical analyst and there are true believers.

    Personally, I think it is useless, not only for equities and bonds, but even more so for tangible assets like coins, art, precious metals, etc.

    Cal
     
    Paul M. and baseball21 like this.
  9. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Neither of those have value to Wall Street traders, it's not the 1970s anymore. They trade based off of algorithms and individual company profiles not the DOW which just kicks out anything that doesn't perform anyway like GE. Which traders exactly were like well I was going to short GE but the DOW is up so I'll just buy more. Show me a single trader using the DOW to make decisions
     
    calcol likes this.
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Any index is valuable if used appropriately.

    I believe Doug showed to excellent effect how to use it, and why it has value.

    Would I use it to predict the price of a BTW Half in 2019? No. But I would use it to gauge the general trend of the market.
     
    geekpryde, Dug13 and ldhair like this.
  11. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Compared to the huge declines in 1989 and 1992, the weaknesses post-2010 are hardly visible on that long-term chart. They do show up on the smaller interval charts that GDJMSP provided.

    We need to know if the decline since 2014 is broad-based or if it was concentrated in a few select coins and/or stuff tied to bullion (gold or silver).
     
  12. geekpryde

    geekpryde Husband and Father Moderator

    I was about to reply with my thoughts on this PCGS index, and what value indexes in general have, but Doug basically made all the points that I would have made, more eloquently and with less typos. So just go re-read what Doug said. :bookworm:
     
  13. KSorbo

    KSorbo Well-Known Member

    It would be interesting to see a similar index for other major countries’ coins, or for early US copper or other more specialized areas of numismatics. I wonder how much of the PCGS Index decline is due to collectors having more choices of where to spend their money. Personally I’ve been staying away from Morgans and other such widgets and spending more on world and early American.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    And you can easily do that by looking at the Market Segment Indexes -

    upload_2019-11-11_10-37-52.png


    - found here - https://www.pcgs.com/prices/coin-index/pcgs3000

    Just scroll down once you're on that page.

    But just to give ya an example, even the one that had gone up almost forever, the Key Dates and Rarities Index, it too has been falling for the last 10 years.
    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/coin-index/key-dates-and-rarities


    upload_2019-11-11_10-40-21.png


    As you can see, it did try and recover a couple of times, just couldn't pull it off. And if ya look at all the rest, they'll show ya they've been dropping for 10 years too.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  15. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Thanks ! :D

    Yes, if you go back 10 years we had a nice recovery in both asset prices and PM prices. But it appears that many segments were still "burning off" the excess of previous bubbles dating back to the early-2000's and when gold and silver prices fell sharply in 2012 and 2013, prices remained "sticky" and didn't fall, betting on a PM rebound.

    When both slumped -- esp. silver -- in subsequent years, the air came out of the coins tied to those 2 PMs.
     
  16. Derek2200

    Derek2200 Well-Known Member

    I find the PCGS index very useful in analyzing the market, getting take on future trends, and looking at specific series / where they are going.

    Agree with GDJMSP above.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2019
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Well, I'm gonna make a double post here because it's specific to this. As you'll see, and see clearly, the coins are definitely not tied to the PMs.

    https://www.cointalk.com/threads/us-coin-market-stagnant.349811/page-5#post-3866428

    I suppose everybody has their opinions of what might be better, or worse, when it comes to composing indexes for the purpose of tracking markets. But I do agree with one thing, there's always a balance that has to be found if you wish your index to reflect accuracy for tracking a given target, while at the same time eliminating other outside influences such as those you mention - bullion vs numismatics.

    So, to see whether or not these PCGS indexes do their jobs, all ya gotta do is look at the charts involved over the same time period. So let's look at silver dollars vs silver.

    [​IMG]

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/coin-index/morgan-and-peace-dollar


    [​IMG]

    https://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/ag3650nyb.html


    And generic gold coins vs gold.

    [​IMG]

    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/coin-index/generic-gold-coin


    [​IMG]

    https://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au3650nyb.html


    Now I don't about you, or anybody else, but the obvious disparity between those charts clearly indicates to me that the coin indexes are doing a great job of tracking the value trend while at the same time eliminating outside influences such as bullion prices. And that tells me that the components of the indexes are exactly what they should be in order to do the job they were designed to do.

    edit - well, same kind of date thing is happening with the PCGS charts again. Use the links to see charts ending in Oct '19.
     
    GoldFinger1969 likes this.
  18. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    To me, you can clearly see that the coin prices are following a LAGGED movement in PM prices. It's not an exact relationship, but you can clearly see they are tied.

    Prices are sticky to the downside -- they teach you that in Economics 101. So coins more directly tied to PMs tend to rise faster to the upside than they do correct to the downside.

    You have to remember: you have a NUMISMATIC premum for many coins. Sometimes, it's miniscule (MS 63 common Saints). Othertimes, it's HUGE (MS 66 common Saints). At times, the need to "burn off" the excess of a previous big move/bubble can overwhelm the underlying PM movement.

    Like I said, GD, I don't claim it's a 1-for-1 movement. There's lots of moving parts here. And for world or domestic coins with zero or close-to-zero PM content, I would suspect that aside from a roaring bull market in overall coin prices, that these would trade on their own merits and supply/demand.

    Think of the movement in ultra-high real estate (>$10 MM homes) vs. the housing market in general....or high-end art vs. stuff at your local art shop.....or classic cars (Ferrari, Porsche, Corvette) vs. the used car market in general.
     
  19. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I readily admit that if and when the value of coins is limited to their basic melt value, their prices are going to mimic the spot prices. And yes, the one usually lags slightly behind the other. But the charts clearly show that doesn't always happen. And if you do throw numismatic value into the mix, the tie to precious metals goes right out the window, it neither lags nor leads. In that regard we're saying the same thing.

    My primary point with my posts is quite simple - the PCGS index charts do a good job of tracking the trend of the coin market, for both the generic coins (melt value coins), and numismatic value coins.

    But if anybody thinks they can come up with a tool, an index, that does a better job or more accurate job - have at it, I'm all for it.
     
  20. GoldFinger1969

    GoldFinger1969 Well-Known Member

    Hey, maybe I'll bring this to PCGS's or NGC's attention at FUN. Maybe Heritage or Stacks wants to create an index, too (free advertising !).

    It should be even easier for an auction house, with all of their last 2 decades of activity digitalized, to backtrack and create a useful index of 50 liquid coins.
     
  21. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I know you think that would be useful but it's way, way too small of a sampling for a coin index. Now if you wanted to do it for a specific type, or even a series, then yeah that would work. But for anything beyond that, I don't think so.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page