Ive not had any of my coins sent in for gradeing. Simply cause I like them doesn't mean they are grade worthy. Thought I'd put a few out , see what you'll think . Thanks
I agree that the 89 CC is clearly counterfeit. I really hope that you didn't pay much for it, or are able to return it. If genuine, that would be a very expensive coin. The 90 is EF details, harshly cleaned. It is worth its silver content, $13 or so.
As reading down the thread, it was my first thought also as I have seen silver plated Chinese Copper core coins that had this coloration. I am more hesitant about the 2nd coin, but likely for the 89-CC. IMO, Jim
The most obvious immediate indicator is the overall mushiness of the strike, especially on the obverse. Genuine coins will have a crisp strike.
Just look at the obverse, not a single design element is properly struck, everything is kind of “flat”. It’s easy to spot such fakes after a couple of years...
In addition, if you look at the high points, you'll see whatever metal it is that had been plating the coin was worn away, and is now exposing some other metal, probably brass. The 1890 looks OK, but not really worth grading in that condition, $20-$25 is a fair range as it has better details than most circulated morgans.
Thanks to all who commented . I couldn't find a 1889 cc vam for out center. Thanks you saved me a lot trouble sending them in for grade.
I'm not convinced either that it is OK. I think I see some raised dots on the reverse as well as questioning some of the letter shapes. Weight and magnetism are easy to check.
I think the Chinese make the key dates look aged and circulated like that to explain the weakness in strike, Liberty's hair for example on the 89cc, just a theory.