Morgan Grading Help

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by jimmy-bones, Jul 23, 2007.

  1. jimmy-bones

    jimmy-bones Senior Member

    Please help me with this Morgan. I picked up this recent GSA addition to my collection. I'm stuck between MS64 and MS65. All opinions are appreciated. Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. tjenkins_1983

    tjenkins_1983 Numismaniac

    Well, I don't know if I would say that high. I would say 63 at the most. Very nice though.
     
  4. DJCoinz

    DJCoinz Majored in Morganology

    Looks like an easy MS64 to me. :thumb:
     
  5. rotobeast

    rotobeast Old Newbie

    Does that happen to be a VAM-28 ?
    (Doubled Date, S/S Lower Loop)
     
  6. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

  7. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Really nice coin. I say MS64.
     
  8. b.j.

    b.j. Senior Member

    I would say MS-64. Very few marks. Maybe a shot at 65.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Jimmy - can you post a pic of the holder that coin is in ?
     
  10. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank


    GDJMSP:
    That is a GSA holder, that usually hold CC dollars.
    This is a nice scarce coin in that holder.
     
  11. jimmy-bones

    jimmy-bones Senior Member

    I need some time to get a photo up, but in the meantime...the holder is the standard black hardpack. The tops reads "United States" and the bottom says " Uncirculated Silver Dollar". This is the appropriate holder for a non-CC GSA Dollar. I also have the MU card with it.
     
  12. jimmy-bones

    jimmy-bones Senior Member

    I'm not very good with VAMs, but it definately one of the double date ones.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Jimmy I asked for the pic because I have never, ever, seen an S mint coin in a GSA holder. I also asked for another reason, this particular coin is either very weakly struck, which is extremely unusual for S mint Morgans, or it has wear. So I wonder if perhaps someone opened the GSA case and substituted the coin.
     
  14. DJCoinz

    DJCoinz Majored in Morganology

    I have seen several S mint coins in GSA holders...mostly 1881-S and they command a hefty premium on ebay. ;)

    hmmm. To me, this coin looks fairly well struck without any traces of rub or wear, but it would be nice to see the whole holder to make sure it isn't damaged.
     
  15. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**

    It may be just the holder detracting from the details but the coin appears to an awfully weak strike for an 1882-S! As a result, I believe that it will go MS-63 or possibly MS-64 but is too weak for an MS-65. Not sure about any doubling of the Date and/or Mintmark and would need better close up pics.


    Frank
     
  16. DJCoinz

    DJCoinz Majored in Morganology

    I don't know what you're seeing that I'm not 'cause this doesn't look weakly struck to me.
     
  17. jimmy-bones

    jimmy-bones Senior Member

    I'm having troubles getting the picture to fit the 100kb CT requirtement. Any suggestions? I don't see any evidence of crack-out. (But thanks for looking out for me.:) ) I understand your concern since the non-CC hardpacks are much more rare than the CCs. As far as the S mint GSAs, there are very few in hardpacks. The only years issued with approximate release totals were: 1878 (extremely rare), 1879 (3,600), 1880 (2,200), 1881 (900), 1882 (840), and 1890 (very rare). I'll keep trying to get a better photo, but assuming this is an original GSA coin, do you think my grading is appropriate...there is no wear?
     
  18. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    It's the detail of the obverse mainly, especially the hair. It's no where near struck as well as an S mint coin should be. If it were an O mint I wouldn't think twice about it - but an S ? As for evidence of the case being opened, you probably wouldn't see any - they open right up if you know how.

    But let's assume it's original. Because of the weak strike the coin would grade no better than 63 IMO and might even be a 62.
     
  19. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**


    Doug,

    You are right about the hair! However, the overall appearance looks weak. On the Obverse, besides the hair, the Stars and some of the Letters appear shallow and note how Miss Liberty's cap seems to fade into the fields. On the Reverse, much of the details and especially the Lettering and Wreath appear shallow and the Eagle's breast and the lower portion of it's right wing (on the left when viewing the coin) feathers are weak. Like I said, it might just be the holder degrading the appearance of the design elements but they are definitely much weaker than much of the 1882-S Morgans that I have ever seen.


    Frank
     
  20. zaneman

    zaneman Former Moderator

    Wow! I've never seen an s-mint in anything except for one of the soft pack holders. Do you happen to have the paper insert and the original box?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page