I'm pretty sure this is a MAD Strike, but it stuck out to me for some reason and I wanted to share and confirm. I usually look at Lincoln cents and I'm not used to seeing such an unusual rim; I admit there is a knowledge gap here for me with dimes. Thanks for the feedback.
Thanks. I haven't seen too many dimes with a significant MAD. Is that rim on the reverse what a more pronounced MAD looks like? I know MADs aren't irregular, but this one stood out to me.
Very late stage Collar Clash . https://www.cointalk.com/threads/found-in-change-1984-p-roosevelt-dime-error.248477/
I couldn't find any indications of a collar clash that doesn't show the notches in the rim. Could it still be a collar clash? http://www.maddieclashes.com/393-2/
Here's an article from Error Ref on a collar clash . http://www.error-ref.com/collar-clash/ I guess it also could be caused from this quote from the article . " When collar clash occurs on the anvil die, it is probably from a repeated up-and-down scraping action of the die neck against the working face of the collar. However, a sharp sideways impact that drives the die neck into the collar’s working face could also produce this pattern of serrations ".
@paddyman98 agreed @Rick Stachowski I looked at that area closely, I don't think those are serrations from the collar; it just looks a little funny. It's more or less smooth in hand. Any idea which error would affect the edge of the coin?
Here's the edge @Rick Stachowski pointed at, it's been smoothed out from the strike. Other side of the edge seems normal:
Haha, okay, that's what I thought you meant but wasn't sure. Whatever the error turns out to be, I think this one's a keeper