Mintmark on Walking Liberty Halves

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Dimedude2, Nov 25, 2018.

  1. Dimedude2

    Dimedude2 Member

    I am working on a presentation on Walking Liberty Halves, and I am looking for information on why they changed the mintmark location in 1917 from the obverse to the reverse. Any feedback would be much appreciated. Thanks!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Traditionally, the mint mark on US coins was always struck on the reverse of the coin, with very few exceptions.........why they (mint) chose to strike the mint mark on the obverse of this example is pure conjecture........but I do enjoy anomaly's. :)
     
  4. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

  5. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    The mint marks had initially been placed on the obverse, the first time that had been done for a regular issue US half dollar since 1839.] On February 14, 1917, Mint Director Von Engelken ordered that the mint mark be moved from the obverse to the reverse, stating that the obverse placement had the appearance of a die defect. At that time, Von Engelken had resigned pending appointment to the post of president of the Federal Land Bank for the Third District; once he left to take that position, he was succeeded by Raymond Baker. In April, Baker was asked for written confirmation of Von Engelken's order, and after he obliged, the mint mark was duly moved. The majority of the 1917 half dollars struck at Denver (1917-D) and San Francisco (1917-S) bear the mint mark on the reverse.

    I don't think it looks like a die defect.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    SlipperySocks likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page