Malaysia $1 dollar note with triple errors?UNIQUE?Need help from the expert,urgent!!!

Hi,Im new member over here and Im having alot of trouble and questions with this notes below:

FIRST NOTE

Malaysia 1986 second series type 2(b)$1 dollar normal note.

SECOND NOTE

Malaysia 1986 second series type 2(b)$1 dollar note with triple errors?

THIRD NOTE

Malaysia 1982 second series blindman type 1(a)$1 dollar normal note.

All this notes were printed by thomas de la rue

Obviously,the second note is definely much difference compare with the first note even their same series and issued in the same year.The difference is the second note has no security intermittent 'stardust',the shinning thing is missing on the centre icon.Surprisingly,the slimmer security thread lining is not as thick as the first note but just exactly like the blindman series note.The second note security feature is completely difference compare with the normal note(first note)but it is exactly the same with the older version blindman series note(third note).I absolutely feel very curious about it and certainly never seen anything like this before.Im still not very sure if the second note is normal type,tripple error or an unique note becouse it is only listed the normal note in my catalogue.So I need someone who is a truthly banknote expert to help me to identify this note if this is normal or tripple errors type and also please let me know if this note with this three things are listed in your catalogue.I have uploaded with some superlarge scans,pease enlarge the scans below and compare them,probably you will see the difference.Anyway,I hope to hear from you as soon as possible,Thanks.

To know and learn more about this second series $1 dollar note please visit this link at http://malaysianbanknotes.blogspot.com/search/label/Security%20Feature its a malaysian banknote blog,dont worry.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Im note sure what your note is.. but i dont see it to be a 'triple error' note! What i possibly see is a note that is not yet listed in your book. I find it ALL the time! I get a note that is not listed in any of my references. But it always turns out to be either a variety of an existing note, or an issue that is not yet reported in the recent publications.

I would certainly keep it! But i just dont see it as an error.

 

Interesting Malaya currency. :computer: