Key Date Standing Liberty Quarter

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Collecting Nut, Dec 21, 2024.

  1. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Except for the 1916 this is the lowest mintage of the series. Designed by Hermon A. MacNeil. In 1917 Liberty’s bare breast was covered due to public outrage. In 1925 the fate was recessed in order to stop the date from wearing off. The earlier issues developed worn dates due to being raised. The recessed dates proved to be more lasting.
    Only 396,000 were minted and despite circulation wear, this is one of them.
    CD7D0549-888F-41BE-93D6-F983E696605A.jpeg A3C6CCB2-AE2C-413E-9E4B-0FCD0E505013.jpeg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Why, in the year of our Lord 2024, does this fable and myth perpetuated by the insufferable Breen still exist?

    This is completely unsubstantiated in history.

    The truth is: The country was preparing for War. When the coin was designed, it was a time of peace. There were problems with the design and struggles at the mint. Herman MacNeil was called in to re-work the coin, and it was decided that Liberty should armor up in preparation for War.

    You can read the remarkably well written Wikipedia article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_Liberty_quarter

    Or, you can read Roger Burdette's immaculate original research in the Renaissance of American Coinage (which the wikipedia article heavily references)

    The idea that her breast was covered because of prudes is a fairy tale.
     
  4. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Forgot to say in my rant... nice coin by the way. Love the color and even wear. Congrats.
     
  5. russell1256

    russell1256 Well-Known Member

    Because of you, physics-fan3.14, I just bought from Amazon Roger Burdette's Renaissance of American Coinage 1905-1908. I hope I hate it or else i will be buying both otjher books (and they are not cheap).
     
    Inspector43 and beaver96 like this.
  6. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    No, they are not cheap. But the amount of original research that went into those books is completely worth it. What you'll find is... many of the popular myths around the coins we love are lies. The truth is quite fascinating on its own. I love the trilogy, own signed copies, and reference them regularly. I hope you enjoy it as much as I do!
     
  7. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    Very nice. I like the Standing Liberty Series. I was fortunate to be an active collector at a time when SLQ's were found in change almost everyday. Most had the date worn off. But, occasionally we would find one that was readable/visible. Here is a 1927-S that I found in change way back then.
    1927-S.jpg
     
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Wow.

    I remember my father talking about how many Indian cents were still circulating in the '40s and '50s. He got a Flying Eagle cent in change, once. And a Shield nickel.
     
    Eric Babula and Inspector43 like this.
  9. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    Eric Babula and Tall Paul like this.
  10. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Eric Babula and Inspector43 like this.
  11. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    MacNeil may have decided it but it was not ordered by the mint. They gave him a list of changes they wanted made and said no changes other than the ones requested. They didn't request the chain mail.
     
    Eric Babula likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page