Just Bought on eBay: 1885 Morgan- New Orleans

Haven't received this yet but just won on ebay. These pictures are the sellers but pretty good. What do you think about the coin and grading company.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I am not familiar is NES. I think PCGS and NGC are the top coin grading companies but I could be wrong on that.

 

The coin is nice, but slim chance it is a MS67
Never heard of that grading company before...
Post better pics, once you get the coin in hand
And don't get your hopes up too high... This is not a MS67...
Just be careful buying on ebay, it is all common sense
Next time, I'd buy from a Top TPG...
Good luck

 

Looks like a nice Morgan. I definitely wouldn't trust the MS67 grade. NES isn't one of the companies I would trust either.

 

According to Error World:

 

I wouldn't trust their grades at all.

 

Here's more about NES



Joe

 

lol

 

Assuming this is the item, I don't think you did terribly badly. If it is a 67, you got a steal.

Joe

 

The pictures are too bright to get a good look at the coin. NES is not a reputable grading service so I would assume the coin is overgraded. You won't know what you got until you get it in hand.

However, best guess is the coin appears to be MS from the pics but it is really hard to tell. I can see some clear bag marks. Assuming the coin isn't damaged in some way and not too bagged up...I don't think you did too bad for $43. But, it's really hard to tell.

 

LOL!!! That's funny.

 

! Lol

 

It looks like you got yourself a MS coin, although that flash is trying to hide a few things
MS62-64 at best

 

I agree with tmoneyeagles it'll prob. fall into the 62-64 range

 

Yeah. Looks like it could be a 64. Nearly impossible to tell from those pics though.

 

Sellers hiding something....
He knows the coin isn't a MS67...
We are on to him.. And NES!

 

I will post better pics when I receive it. And, may have it regraded by a more reputable company.

 

sounds good to me :thumb:

 

It looks like NES 's favorite grade is MS-67 , I agree it's probably a 61-63 .
rzage

 

I don't think they had labels printed with anything less than 67, did they??