Is this a 1922 Weak D, no D or just heavily worn?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by BigTee44, Oct 24, 2013.

  1. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    image.jpg image.jpg image.jpg Top sums it up. What do you think?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. rickmp

    rickmp Frequently flatulent.

    IMO, heavily worn. Others?
     
    jello likes this.
  4. harris498

    harris498 Accumulator

    Also vote heavily worn. MMs from the teens and early 20's seem to have worn away quite quickly in circulation.
     
  5. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    It appears to be a 1922 Weak D to me, but reverse a little fuzzy.
     
  6. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    IMO it's a 22-D heavily worn.
     
  7. coingeek12

    coingeek12 Well-Known Member

    yeah, heavily worn.
     
  8. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    My guess is a weak "D", but straight on pictures of the reverse (and less wear) would definitely be helpful.
     
  9. silentnviolent

    silentnviolent accumulator--selling--make an offer I can't refuse

    I echo the intimation that it's a heavily worn 22D.
     
  10. BigTee44

    BigTee44 Well-Known Member

    I'll see if I can get any better pictures of the coin. I was guessing a worn 22-D but after seeing the back I was guessing die #3 with the weak reverse.

    I still think it might end up in my 1922 Plain slot for my Dansco.
     
  11. non_cents

    non_cents Well-Known Member

    Looks like heavy wear in my opinion.
     
  12. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    You won't be able to picture this, be see if the back is rotated bout 15°. If so, it is likely die #3.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page