I HAVE A 1882 S MORGAN DOLLAR IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS MADE YESTERDAY MINT MINT CONDITION NO BAG MARKS

I HAVE NEVER SEEN A DOLLAR THAT IS SO NICE I WOULD THINK THIS COIN WOULD G MADE MS 67 OR MS 68 WHAT DO YOU THINK FULL FEATHERS ON EAGLE BREST THOSE FACE MARKS ARE ON PLASTIC HOLDER

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

If the "face marks" are indeed on the holder as claimed, perhaps you could remove the coin from it and re-photograph it? As it stands, I can't help but to think you're being excessively optimistic.

 

Need better pics without flip.
Looks dipped from the images.
Try to take pictures with natural light.

 

OP, your coins not cleaned, or dipped and the marks on the face are called luster breaks . I would need better images to grade the coin .

 

Rick, I agree, doesn't looked dipped or clean, better pics would be great with better lighting. Nice looking Morgan Coin Man! Pretty tough to get a 67 or 68 but 65 or 66 might work. Better pics would really help.....

 

There are tons of 1882-S Morgans highly graded. Nearly 30,000 by NGC alone at 65 or better. With the provided pictures I would say 65 with a shot at 66.

 

Has anyone here claiming it hasn't been dipped actually ever dipped a coin before?

 

No, what u getting at b4coins ? would it look different or ?

 

I never saw a gold one, just the gold has to be worth something.

 

Very hard to tell from that picture.

I'm curious. What's this about gold?

 

I never saw a gold one.

 

Yes. You said that.

Neither have I.

I still haven't and never expect to.

 

It's a nice 1882-S, but most of them are nice. I also think you're being optimistic with the grading if you think it's better than 64 or 65.

 

Counterfeit?

 

It's a genuine 1882 S and those years from 1880-1882 were the most beautiful products the San Francisco mint had made to that date.

The grading standards have fallen so low that I would agree with MS64 or 65 but at first I would have said 63 depending on what flash and eye appeal it has.