How can a PROOF be an MS65???

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Silver Striker, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. Silver Striker

    Silver Striker Senior Member

    Self grading comes to mind maybe?

    LINK HERE

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    if the proof became contaminated or handled in any way?
     
  4. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Can't - still a proof as far as I know. I think I saw a proof 50 one time where it mentioned the wear. So as far as I know "proof" is the method the coin is made - so the coin will always be proof. If I recall correctly there was pattern IHC that was proof that also mentioned wear.
     
  5. Mark Feld

    Mark Feld Rare coin dealer

    Mishandling wouldn't change a proof coin to an MS coin - though it should lower the grade. Even people who know the difference between a Proof coin and a business strike sometimes place "MS" before the numerical grade - no biggie.
     
  6. jeankay

    jeankay Coin Hoarder

    Checked my '08 Red Book and see the listing for the 1950 PF-65 with a $50.00 value.
    Of course, the final price is always whatever a buyer will pay.
    I would want that 50p Roosevelt to be near perfect and professionally graded for $85.00.
    jeankay
     
  7. The_Cave_Troll

    The_Cave_Troll The Coin Troll

    I sure don't see anything there that makes me think that coin is a proof. The 1950 proofs weren't always well made, but raw and unable to see it in hand I sure wouldn't buy it as a proof.
     
  8. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    I agree with Cave Troll, I honestly don't think that is a proof to begin with. Could be wrong though, since I don't have it in hand.

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  9. mralexanderb

    mralexanderb Coin Collector

    In the CoinValues website the 1950 Pf65 lists for $50. IMO, When I use this pricing guide I buy my coins from 75-50% of their listed value when I can. That would be around $25 to $37.50. I feel that that is a fairer price than what's listed. If that coin is an MS65 then it's listed at $35 which means that $17.50 to $26 is reasonable in MS 65 state.

    Bruce
     
  10. clembo

    clembo A closed mind is no mind

    Can't say I quite agree with that Mark.

    A proof is not an MS coin is it? Doesn't MS refer to business strikes which a proof is not?

    It's either one or the other - can't be both. A dealer putting both on a holder (especially on ebay - the land of the uninformed) seems a bit crooked to me.

    I actually do understand your point but would this coin slab as an MS65 Proof?
     
  11. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    He's just saying it is a common mistake.
     
  12. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Yep, a common mistake. Kinda like calling a cent a penny. Technically incorrect but we all know what they mean. :D
     
  13. Mark Feld

    Mark Feld Rare coin dealer

    No, of course a Proof is not an MS coin, nor did I say it could be. And while "MS" should refer to a business strike, proofs are graded to the same (Sheldon/MS) grading scale. Hence, some people, even knowledgeable ones, place the "MS" in front of the numerical grade for proof coins. I don't see anything necessarily crooked about it.
     
  14. coinman1

    coinman1 Member

    Wouldn't it grade as a PF-65
     
  15. hontonai

    hontonai Registered Contrarian

    Remember, "Stupid" does not equal "Dishonest".
     
  16. coinnewbie01

    coinnewbie01 collector of things**

    maybe he was trying to say here is you Proof, that it is an ms65??? like someone didnt believe he had one. or it could just be a silly mistake.
     
  17. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    If a proof coin entered circulation and received slight wear it may be graded PR-55. PF-55 tells us the coin was struck as a proof coin and it has slight wear.

    The coin would not be graded Proof MS-65 because those are conflicting terms. MS means 'Mint State' which implies the coin is a business strike.

    Below is an example of a circulated proof coin that has been graded PR-55.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. coinman1

    coinman1 Member

    Thank you HOBO,
    That is what I was trying to say in my last post.you have explained it beautifully.the point I was trying to get across was that there are different grades of proof as in circulated proofs.Proof is the way that the coin was struck.
    Thanks again,
    Coinman...
     
  19. Hobo

    Hobo Squirrel Hater

    Proof is the method of manufacture, not condition. Once a proof coin always a proof coin.
     
  20. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    The seller more than likely added the MS instead of PF by mistake(As someone has already pointed out). The thing i never figured out is MS or PF 69, first strikes. In my opinion only coins that grade a 70 should be awarded the first strike designation. The first strikes go under the assumption that the fresh dies produce more pristine coins. Giving a 69 a first strike designation totally contradicts the pristine coin logic.
     
  21. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    I would disagree. Even if a coin is the very first coin struck, it could still be possible for it to get a very minor hit or something to keep it from being a perfect coin. Don't get me wrong, I see where you are coming from (I don't understand the first strike thing either! :D), but, the first coin off of the die can still grade a 69. Or even a 68. I could be totally wrong too though, so I apologize in advance if I am. :D :hug:

    Phoenix :cool:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page