Help Grading an Ike?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jim Johns, Jan 5, 2017.

  1. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Pulled this from a sealed mint set with nice toning! Looks really nice almost proof like in hand. I don't understand the process on grading Ike's since comparisons show some high grades with a few hits, but no hairlines, yet lower grades show no hits and some hairlines. Just wondering on opinions and a detailed rundown on importance from highest to lowest and an experienced opinion on grade with this one if anyone knowledgeable with Ike's can help.. IMG_20170104_163831.jpg IMG_20170104_163930.jpg IMG_20170104_155341.jpg IMG_20170104_155510.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Coinchemistry 2012

    Coinchemistry 2012 Well-Known Member

    The first image looks MS63ish to me. The second image looks UNC details environmentally damaged to me.
     
  4. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    In that condition, I would have left them in the sealed Mint Set. The toning hides a lot of the surface imperfections and that will keep them from being graded about MS-63 at best.
     
  5. Noah Finney

    Noah Finney Well-Known Member

  6. STU

    STU Active Member

    i would have left it in the set i am not for coins of this toneing i do have some nice ones but i would not even grade a coin of this nature
     
  7. 7Jacnum

    7Jacnum Member

    Too many marks, MS62 at best IMO
     
  8. ascrane

    ascrane Member

    MS62 i think
     
  9. cwart

    cwart Senior Member

    62 or 63 for the first, lower for the second
     
  10. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    It's the same coin..
     
  11. Jim Johns

    Jim Johns Active Member

    Why would you not grade it? It's entirely dependent on the angle and looking dead on you can barely make out a nice blue ring around the rim. To each is own but is it really THAT ugly?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page